Originally posted by Mindship
For eventual macroscale quantum teleporting?
So it could roughly be thought of as superluminal communication, but my professors would have me hanged for calling it that.
Originally posted by Mindship
What's the conventional wisdom these days regarding the wavefunction? Real, or just a mathematical metaphor?
Originally posted by AstnerWhat are you using that you're calling it macroscale?
No. It centers around using the concept of quantum entanglement for communication, and what effects might occur under different conditions created by similar systemized processes nearby.
Originally posted by AstnerMaybe just call it "spooky action at a distance," ala Albert.
So it could roughly be thought of as superluminal communication, but my professors would have me hanged for calling it that.
Originally posted by AstnerI was asking because, as I understand it, there's been some debate about the WF's "reality." Eg:
The wave function works well to explain the behavior of particles under certain conditions, and that's why it's used. The same reasoning applies to the particle properties. We're not actually able to look at an elementary particle and determine what it really is, because the light it emits is caused by its vibrations.
Originally posted by Mindship
For eventual macroscale quantum teleporting?What's the conventional wisdom these days regarding the wavefunction? Real, or just a mathematical metaphor?
Originally posted by Mindship
😂Note, though, I'm not asking about eigenstates.
Originally posted by Astner
No. It centers around using the concept of quantum entanglement for communication, and what effects might occur under different conditions created by similar systemized processes nearby.So it could roughly be thought of as superluminal communication, but my professors would have me hanged for calling it that.
The wave function works well to explain the behavior of particles under certain conditions, and that's why it's used. The same reasoning applies to the particle properties. We're not actually able to look at an elementary particle and determine what it really is, because the light it emits is caused by its vibrations.
Originally posted by Mindship
What are you using that you're calling it macroscale?Maybe just call it "spooky action at a distance," ala Albert.
I was asking because, as I understand it, there's been some debate about the WF's "reality." Eg:
I see...
Originally posted by Mindship
What are you using that you're calling it macroscale?
Originally posted by Mindship
Maybe just call it "spooky action at a distance," ala Albert.
Originally posted by Mindship
I was asking because, as I understand it, there's been some debate about the WF's "reality." Eg:
Originally posted by AstnerThat's. Pretty. Darn. Cool...if not downright paradigm-challenging. Good luck with this, and let us know what happens.
The communication occurs through the detection of spins, so we're working with clusters of particles -- some with different spin -- for combinatory purposes.
Originally posted by Astner
The communication occurs through the detection of spins, so we're working with clusters of particles -- some with different spin -- for combinatory purposes.Or a connection through time, not space. Superluminal sounds better though, even if it would get me beaten hand hanged in the closest tree.
This is a popular science article, and I couldn't find the source they referenced. I really have nothing to go by to state a personal interpretation
I was told that communication using entanglement would be impossible. Don't you destroy the information as soon as you detect the spin?
If the known galaxy is apparently a huge black hole spinning smaller galaxies in a rotation. Those smaller galaxies also spinning discs.
And outside is just void. Then arguably the universe is infinite. An infinite void.
But where did the initial bang come from? That's when shit gets esoteric. And that's another story which requires lots of scotch.
Originally posted by AstnerI'm guessing much of the text will involve math, which will leave me in the quantum dust. But I wouldn't mind reading the abstract (copy-paste to private message?). Thanks.
If you want me to I can send you a copy once it's published. If you know your beyond the standard model physics then it shouldn't be too difficult to follow.