Originally posted by carver9
They did NOT hit Hulk with a gamma bomb in the movie. Why would they power him up when they said that were trying to kill both? It was a nuke.
No it was a gamma bomb if you want to confirm all you have to do is go back and watch the movie and listen right before the pilot drops it on them.
Originally posted by janus77
The OP doesn't mention anything restricting movie versions to just what is "cannon to The Avengers".
Originally posted by carver9
They did NOT hit Hulk with a gamma bomb in the movie. Why would they power him up when they said that were trying to kill both? It was a nuke.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Tis true. Fiction is inconsistent. Superman used his speed for those feats. In combat a manhole hurt him.
A manhole cover is harder than flash's fist. Flash's fists thrown a super speed can ktfo even thanos. A manhole made of heavy duty iron, much harder than flash's fist and thrown at superspeed would cut right through him; but this is Superman. The cover should have shattered once it hit superman but it didn't, so is this the inconsistency you speak of?
Originally posted by Diesldude
A manhole cover is harder than flash's fist. Flash's fists thrown a super speed can ktfo even thanos. A manhole made of heavy duty iron, much harder than flash's fist and thrown at superspeed would cut right through him; but this is Superman. The cover should have shattered once it hit superman but it didn't, so is this the inconsistency you speak of?
Just so I'm clear, you think a manhole cover thrown at superspeed would sever Thanos in half or something?
Originally posted by bbrem123
hulk>superman>thorI just dont see movie hulk getting put down. Supes speed and strength would man handle hulk for a while in the beginning of the fight but ultimately he would lose in the end.
...Why?
Superman is millions of times stronger and faster by feats in the movies, and yet you can't see HULK getting put down? The guy who was actually being overrun for a bit in the movie?
Originally posted by CosmicComet
...Why?Superman is millions of times stronger and faster by feats in the movies, and yet you can't see [b]HULK
getting put down? The guy who was actually being overrun for a bit in the movie? [/B]
Supes went to recharge in the sun. Which is the only reason why he was able to lift the island. I dont think hulk was even hurt from that assault either.
Its just hard to gauge superman just on his lifting feats. He didnt have any battle feats at all. And the opposite with Hulk.
All im saying is I can see why some say supes is superior and some say hulk. They had completely different showings which makes it hard to compare.
Originally posted by bbrem123
Supes went to recharge in the sun. Which is the only reason why he was able to lift the island. I dont think hulk was even hurt from that assault either.
No, the f*ck he didn't.
He simply went up higher in the sky where the sun was still visible above the cloud cover, he didn't even LEAVE the atmosphere.
It wasn't even an amp, he was simply healing himself enough to do it, since he still had kryptonite shards in him the whole time.
So basically, a weakened, dying superman > millions of times stronger than Avengers Hulk.
Oh, not to mention he stopped Earthquakes and Volcanoes in the first Superman movie, which is still canon for Superman Returns.
Sorry, feats give you the wins, not personal intuition based on nothing but no-limits fallacy.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
No, the f*ck he didn't.He simply went up higher in the sky where the sun was still visible above the cloud cover, he didn't even LEAVE the atmosphere.
It wasn't even an amp, he was simply healing himself enough to do it, since he still had kryptonite shards in him the whole time.
So basically, a weakened, dying superman > millions of times stronger than Avengers Hulk.
Oh, not to mention he stopped Earthquakes and Volcanoes in the first Superman movie, which is still canon for Superman Returns.
Sorry, feats give you the wins, not personal intuition based on nothing but no-limits fallacy.
👆