Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
If you like. I disagree. Oswald managed (if you believe that.) He was a schmoe with a bolt action, according to that version, so whay not.
😆 Dude, You're horribly strawmanning again. You've some how deluded yourself to come to the conclusion that just because JFK was assassinated:
any assassin of a fictional president=LHO
What type of logic are using?
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yes the Nakatomi incident (being the most base level thing McClane faced) was more complicated than that version of events.
No it wasn't.
Assassination of POTUS>>>>>>....robbery
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well what was 24 after the 1st time his heart stopped then?
Bauer telling the afterlife for the one and only time
"LEAVE ME THE PHUCK ALONE"
which is why he has never died, even after being stabbed in the stomach twice
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
In my opinion, they were just TV villains/TV fodder
Which, no offense, doesn't mean dick in an objective debate
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Your amusifying in an attempt to bring levity to this thread, that has so blatantly gone over my head as Im getting way too serious is making me look foolish...
I'm approaching this thread as anyone would approach a Versus thread on this forum.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well luckily, the answers flow naturally, due to lack of challenge. 😛 Really though, given that the vid you site is an hour long, thats some difference. But dont worry: Soon this will consume more time than Ive got and you will be able to use that fact to declare with fists beating on chest that you have somehow won due to the lack of interested opposing debators. And that anyone not caught in a loop of trollism has "pussied out due to being wrong" somehow in your book... 🙂
Hey if you can't win,...Quit! That's an excellent motto 🙂
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
A euphymism of course, that is obvious to anyone who has actually seen the DH movies.
😆 total hyprocrisy coming from a guy who won't even look at feats that were directly compiled to see
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Look. Who's poster your semen hits, as you lay dreaming of message board dominance is of no interest to me.
😆 total hyprocrisy coming from a guy who wishes he was McClane's right testicle
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
You like Jack Bauer. We get it.
What does that have to do with this thread? How are you accusing me fanboyism when all I've done is post empirical evidence, whereas you have just been saying "MCCLANE GETZ THA MCWINZ WIT THA MCFRIES!!!"
Also, before you accuse one of fanboyism, let's take a look at the guy who actually said that McClane could take on Jason Bourne 😆
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well Mcclane did, and Im guaranteeing that his riddles/plan caught you out the 1st time through...as it did to all watching.
Bauer's taken on Marwan, whose plan was far more complex.
McClane=Unimpressive
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Hey you're are the one bring in offensive names for females here in rage over fictional characters. Not i.
A reference of course, that is obvious to anyone who has actually seen The Avengers. My amusifying in an attempt to bring levity to this thread, that has so blatantly gone over your head as you're getting way too serious, is making you look foolish...
'
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Cause its like saying: "Wow 356 bullets through the brain is way worse than 5." Well nope. 'Cause you're still dead after the minimal amount of the two, right...?!
Well 5 bullets in the head will kill you. 356 will decimate your entire head into a bloody stump
and you used a horrible analogy 😂
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well lets look at this objectively. Firstly, you are falsely attaching the word "gimping" to something it doesn't apply to...
Secondly. No he is not better.
Well let's look at this objectively. In order to look at something objectively, you need to be able to see it from all sides. Now I've sen both franchises, so I look at this objectively.
You on the other hand are incapable of being objective. You've only seen one side of tale (which you are clearly biased against) and are ignoring blatantly posted evidence, and thus have incomplete knowledge
Thus, objectively, your "opinion" means diddly squat
And in order to know he is not better, you have to know what's done, feats which you are willingly choose to ignore because you are scared
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Given that you rate Bauer over McClane, Im surprised you remember any of them...!
Well hey, if I forget, i can easily just click on the video I made
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well in order to explain this to yourself, you must get contaminated point blank by a massive meltdown, and then compare this to 107 more.!
If one nuclear meltdown could destroy the US, 108 would wipe out the world, considering that the fallout of 108 meltdowns isn't just going to stay contained to North America. It would disperse. It's simple logic. Oh yeah, you think McClane can beat Bourne. You don't operate by that, I forgot 😛
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Oh well then, we'll just assume Im right then, shall we....?
You haven't even seen all the evidence, so until then, any judgement you make means jack shit
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Note that reversing them didnt make them "XP or LD". no. It made "BJ". Live with it...! 😂
I am
so glad that you have have finally reached the intellectual capacity of a 4th grader. Congratulations on that!
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
that this would somehow diminish his ability to be better than Bauer.
Of course it won't diminish it. You can't lose what you never had...
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
And you'd be wrong too, cause of screen feats....
Which you are ignoring
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Shame. I think you can do better than that.
I did. I put Bauer's feats in a video