Originally posted by golem370
True he has ranged attacks but he is a warrior first so he would more to face off with the Hulk
Being a warrior is the only reason it's a competition. If Thor doesn't melee, he will never lose to Hulk. He enjoys brawls though which is why Hulk can compete and beat him. In some incarnations very very badly.
Originally posted by carver9Its hardly the same unless you do ignore what happened on panel. Hulk doesn't possess the cheap trick Rulk used so he has to outmatach a Thor that beat Bor, The Destroyer armor and easily restored asgard
Even though Rulk, someone that WWH stomped with a mere thunderclapped ripped through OF Thor...I agree, on panel proof shows that WWH would beat OF Thor.
Originally posted by golem370
True he has ranged attacks but he is a warrior first so he would more to face off with the Hulk
Warriors have used ranged weapons throughout history, so being a warrior would hardly keep Thor from using them.
Writers just use the "he's a warrior" excuse when they get called out for writing Thor down to his opponents level.
Originally posted by golem370No such thing as class 1000 and Thors ranged attacks are far more powerful than anything Bi Beast or Wendigo can muster ask Surtur, Galactus, Chaos King, The Phoenix force, an amped Hulk ect ect
Well if hulk can take blows from two class 1000 characters I doubt Thor could do much to Hulk ranged or other wise.
Originally posted by carver9Says you Thor has also dropped various versions of Hulk sometimes in less than 3 panels. Thors versatility is the main reason why Hulk loses
Hulk has also walked through attacks that was warping reality and this was a far weaker Hulk. Thor versatility isn't dropping WBH.