DC's Shared universe will start with...

Started by DARTH POWER38 pages
Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
But when fighting his physique is covered (and enhanced) by the suit so your claim that his physique adds to his demeanour when fighting is a contradiction. We might see his physique when training but as soon as that suit goes on it's meaningless when beefing up his image. You couldn't see his pecs and abs after putting the BB and TDK suit after all. In fact Bale looks quite gaunt at times as Bruce Wayne, especially in the face.

I meant from the audience's perspective. The audience see's Bale topless, see's he has a built but toned and agile looking physique, then they believe "yeah this guy could seriosuly kick some a**"..

Kind of like Daniel Craig as Bond, even though in a suit you can't tell he's that muscular.

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
Not quite sure with the Gollum example as that's a readily identifiable quote and is repeated often but not made fun of. What is made fun of more is the actual performance of an actor and how they perform in a particular scene, like if an actor delivers a really bad accent/voice. They don't laugh at Bale because of what he says, it's how he says it.

I know it was mainly Nolan who made this such a legendary Batman series. But do you really think everyone would admire this Batman series so much if they thought the casting as Batman was bad, and that he sounds stupid??

I don't. I think people have fun with the Batman voice. You might have seen the Big Bang Theory when Sheldon says "I'm Batman".. There was no mention of Bale, him being a silly Batman making a stupid Batman voice. People are just having fun with the Batman voice.

Yes It's something that has probably cropped up more since Bale played him. Clooney didn't even put on a Bat voice. In fact I can't think of anything in particular that people make fun his Batman about. And yet we know how popular Clooney was as Batman.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
I meant from the audience's perspective. The audience see's Bale topless, see's he has a built but toned and agile looking physique, then they believe "yeah this guy could seriosuly kick some a**"..

Kind of like Daniel Craig as Bond, even though in a suit you can't tell he's that muscular.

I know it was mainly Nolan who made this such a legendary Batman series. But do you really think everyone would admire this Batman series so much if they thought the casting as Batman was bad, and that he sounds stupid??

I don't. I think people have fun with the Batman voice. You might have seen the Big Bang Theory when Sheldon says "I'm Batman".. There was no mention of Bale, him being a silly Batman making a stupid Batman voice. People are just having fun with the Batman voice.

Yes It's something that has probably cropped up more since Bale played him. Clooney didn't even put on a Bat voice. In fact I can't think of anything in particular that people make fun his Batman about. And yet we know how popular Clooney was as Batman.

Maybe before the suit is put on yes, but at that point he's Bruce and your argument was about how Batman is perceived and with the suit it's not clear. Had he been wearing a thinner suit like Captain America then his physique would be more about Bale and not the suit. Regarding Craig's bond I'm not sure I agree with that either because his physique comes through pretty well especially the upper body and shoulders.

Well every take of every character has fans and they may not like the voice but stick with it because they like other things within the movies.

But the justification for using the voice to that extreme is absurd because a. the script would hold the key to if his identity is discovered because of it and b. he has the lower half of his mouth in full view (which if he cuts himself shaving or has recognizable stubble/lips then he's blown anyway) and with that an obvious lisp it makes the overblown voice unnecessary. This what Nolan leaves himself open to when using justification for some things and not others - for option b. for example, using his own rules he should have had a full face mask. The Burton/Schumacher films didn't work with this justification BS so they can get away with a lot more 'factual error's' or 'fails in logic'.

But people weren't gruffing their voices up to insane degrees when Keaton/Kilmer/were in the suit (Clooney didn't bother) and if Sheldon did say that then I'm guessing he said that post TDK. Even if that is not true he wouldn't be referring to late-80s, early-90s movies since BBT started in 2007 and even thats two years after BB.

Originally posted by Newjak
First off Alien vs Predator is a bad example imo not only because it wasn't that good, I actually kinda liked it myself but mostly for nostalgic purposes, but because when these movies were first created they had no intention of a shared universe. That came way later after fans wanted it because of an Alien Skull prop in the second Predator's movie which was just thrown in there for fun.

That spawned the comics, the game which led into the movies. This kind of showed to as they were basically trying to shoehorn in two separate Universes into one movie.

Now while some would say the time and effort given to showing that the Avengers were a combined universe detracted from the overall story for the individual movies it served to help create a really great one.

Showing them as a shared Universe throughout helped add some depth to the Avengers movie personally. People like Agent Choulson, items like the Cosmic Cube helped link the world a lot better. Howard Stark in Captain America was a brilliant move imo.

Not to say it has to be this way but I do think that marketing choice by Marvel did help give the Avengers movie and the fans a little extra which the JL movie could use.

You could possibly link them all together by say Cademus considering them a threat and deciding to build a super weapon (Doomsday/Amazo) to help the world should these super gods go bad except it gets out and can't be stop. The linkage in every movie could be a Cademus Agent being shown doing something taking something. Superman's DNA or Kyrptonian Tech, GL's bad guy's power source, Wonder Woman DNA Sample, piece of Batman tech or Batman Villain tech, Flash DNA sample stuff like that. Maybe not even that straight forward.

Or you could go a very low brow type of thing and just include a teaser trailer at the end of every movie for the next JLer individual movie coming out.

Just something to get people excited.

I know Alien vs. Predator wasn't originally planned. But it's the same idea if you pretend like you didn't do any research on why the crossover was made. Movies taking place in the same universe having either no connection whatsoever or small cameos and references (like the Alien skull in Predator 2) until the big crossover comes out. It's the exact same case except that unlike Alien vs. Predator, DC would have JL planned out from the start.

I disagree that showing a shared universe being present = bigger box office success. It worked with Marvel because it was the first time something like this was ever done. It was something new that hasn't been tried in live-action before. But now we've already seen it. Not saying it won't work again but just that it's not a guarantee that this marketing can work again now that it's been already used.

I said as long as they don't show it's a shared universe or they have just small cameos/few names being mentioned, it should be fine. I would count the Cadmus thing and the after-credits trailer as being more of a cameo. As long as it's not "in your face" about it like the Marvel movies were (especially Iron Man 2), then it should be fine. But when you have Superman showing up in a Batman movie to have a talk with him or something like that, that's where the problem would be IMO.

And maybe not showing all the movies taking place in the same universe just might be a good marketing technique. Imagine if you weren't a comic book fan, you saw a bunch of (hopefully) great DC movies for the past couple of years all having little to no connection to each other, and then while you're sitting in theatres waiting for a movie to start while watching the trailers, all of a sudden you see Batman, Superman, and the rest of the JL members (who by that time, if their movies have been successful, would have reached the iconic status and popularity of someone like Iron Man or at least Thor or Captain America) standing side by side fighting against something/someone. Unlike the Avengers movie, which you knew would happen from the start, JL would take you by surprise. Kinda like how the Joker card at the end of Batman Begins took many by surprise. It wasn't expected. Not saying this marketing will definitely work but hey, you never know...

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z

Well every take of every character has fans and they may not like the voice but stick with it because they like other things within the movies.

But the justification for using the voice to that extreme is absurd because a. the script would hold the key to if his identity is discovered because of it and b. he has the lower half of his mouth in full view (which if he cuts himself shaving or has recognizable stubble/lips then he's blown anyway) and with that an obvious lisp it makes the overblown voice unnecessary. This what Nolan leaves himself open to when using justification for some things and not others - for option b. for example, using his own rules he should have had a full face mask. The Burton/Schumacher films didn't work with this justification BS so they can get away with a lot more 'factual error's' or 'fails in logic'.

But people weren't gruffing their voices up to insane degrees when Keaton/Kilmer/were in the suit (Clooney didn't bother) and if Sheldon did say that then I'm guessing he said that post TDK. Even if that is not true he wouldn't be referring to late-80s, early-90s movies since BBT started in 2007 and even thats two years after BB.

I admit that the voice does suck but the problem with it IMO isn't that it's growly but that it just doesn't sound good. You can make a voice sound growly and good at the same time. The voice is a problem because it sounds bad, not because it's growly. Batman himself talks with a growly voice in the comics, as it has been stated in many comics before. The examples I can think of from the top of my head are Knightfall (Robin tells Jean-Paul Valley, who is dressed as Batman, to "talk with that growly voice Bruce always talks with" while in the suit) and Batman & Son (Alfred says "Master Wayne, remember that growly voice you had to practice before going out as Batman? You're using it all the time now, sir" and later on in the comic, while at a party as Bruce Wayne, Alfred once again reminds him to "lose that growly voice"😉.

But I personally prefer the Kevin Conroy voice over any other Bat voice 😄 .

(cont. from yesterday's post)

Found this today:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8UNfAKVpPQ

Now THAT is an example of a Batman voice being really deep and growly but badass at the same time. Or at least something similar to that.

Originally posted by spidermanrocks
I admit that the voice does suck but the problem with it IMO isn't that it's growly but that it just doesn't sound good. You can make a voice sound growly and good at the same time. The voice is a problem because it sounds bad, not because it's growly. Batman himself talks with a growly voice in the comics, as it has been stated in many comics before. The examples I can think of from the top of my head are Knightfall (Robin tells Jean-Paul Valley, who is dressed as Batman, to "talk with that growly voice Bruce always talks with" while in the suit) and Batman & Son (Alfred says "Master Wayne, remember that growly voice you had to practice before going out as Batman? You're using it all the time now, sir" and later on in the comic, while at a party as Bruce Wayne, Alfred once again reminds him to "lose that growly voice"😉.

But I personally prefer the Kevin Conroy voice over any other Bat voice 😄 .

Well Robin said 'hoarse, grating voice' rather than 'growly' but I see your point about the references. I thought Rorschach from Watchmen had a good 'Batman voice', agressive but clear. But what is clear was the fact that the voice wasn't helped by Bale's extra mouth movements which clearly made it sound more mangled.

Kilmer's Bat-voice is my favourite, deep, dark and easy to understand while also being different to his Bruce Wayne. He even slipped into the voice while out of the suit in the Bat-cave while tallking to Dick - there was a clear distinction in that scene that he was still coming out of the Batman persona.

it would have been fun if Nolanverse had been a part of the Justice League film, but it won't be...

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/171575-chris-nolan-says-no-to-justice-league

^ Yeah read that earlier. Looks like back to the drawing board for JL. Right now they have nothing to draw on it from. Everything will depend on the success of Man of Steel next year.

Thank god for that.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
it would have been fun if Nolanverse had been a part of the Justice League film, but it won't be...

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/171575-chris-nolan-says-no-to-justice-league

I'm ok with that. Nolan's Batman wouldn't be a good fit for JL movie.

He would be almost useless.

It's more than that. Christopher Nolan was pouring cold water over the whole shared DC Universe idea. And that he won't be involved in any capacity.
I have to think he'll be gunning for the next James Bond project.

Originally posted by roughrider
It's more than that. Christopher Nolan was pouring cold water over the whole shared DC Universe idea. And that he won't be involved in any capacity.
I have to think he'll be gunning for the next James Bond project.
That's ok as good as Nolan is he isn't the only good director around and perhaps his directing style could have hindered instead of helped a JL movie. I don't know for sure,

But I never believed the success of a JL project hinged on Nolan being a part of it though.

Originally posted by Newjak

But I never believed the success of a JL project hinged on Nolan being a part of it though.

Well at the moment it's hinging on nothing. All they have towards a big screen JL team up so far is a flop GL movie.

A Batman reboot is not going to be welcomed any time soon.

So everything now rests on the success of Man of Steel next year.

Dwayne Johnson quoted on twitter as saying the rumours about Lobo are true:

"Rumors of me possibly playing LOBO are true. Joel Silver and Brad Peyton working on it now. That could be fun.. "

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/171817-dwayne-johnson-says-he-may-play-lobo

Do you smell what the Main Man is cookin'?

well lets hope this doesn't get pushed back... lol

If they're going to make a Lobo movie, it needs to be R rated and very gory.

This could potentially be a lose/lose here, with Batman being the main issue. People will NOT accept a non-Bale Batman. And i agree with everyone's sentiment who say that Bale's Batman will most likely NOT work in a JL/fantasy universe. Still i'm curious about the project.

Originally posted by dynamix
This could potentially be a lose/lose here, with Batman being the main issue. People will NOT accept a non-Bale Batman. And i agree with everyone's sentiment who say that Bale's Batman will most likely NOT work in a JL/fantasy universe. Still i'm curious about the project.

Why wouldn't they accept a non-Bale batman?

I don't see why people can't accept a non-Bale Batman. Batman is one of the biggest iconic characters of all time and has been very iconic long before Bale even got the part. If people were fine with a different actor as James Bond every decade, I don't see why Batman would be a problem.