Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Mountains weight like 50 billions of tons(the one hulk lifted was stated to weight that much),100 trillion is far greater that 50 billion
No.
That mountain in secret wars was far understated weight wise.
Even a small mountain like Stone Mountain, weighs 60% of a billion tons.
A large mountain like Everest is in the trillions.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
No.That mountain in secret wars was far understated weight wise.
Even a small mountain like Stone Mountain, weighs 60% of a billion tons.
A large mountain like Everest is in the trillions.
Or, Hulk only supported a small fraction of it, instead of actually lifting it up like people have claimed.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Hulk feat of pulling the tectonic plates of a planet together requires [b]sextillions of tons of strength, sextillion>quintillion.not to mention he was moving the tectonic plates to overpower the planet from exploding.So the force it takes to move a planets tectonic layer+over powering a explosion capable of destroying a planet>>>>lifting 200 quintillion tons.
.
Also WBH causually destroying a planet and two moons like that puts him FAR over all star supermans strength.So a planet plus two moons =8 sextillion tons imo. Even if you split the feat in half hulk produced >4 sextillion tons of strength from the mere shockwave of the punch through the air imagin how powerful a punch has to be itself to produce a shockwave that powerful. [/B]
Originally posted by CosmicComet
This is something I've mentioned over and over in other threads yes, and could support the 150 billion ton figure.
Yeah, it's pretty clear Hulk isn't lifting the mountain(let alone the mountain RANGE like some claim) when there's barely enough of a small space for the others not to get crushed.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Yeah, it's pretty clear Hulk isn't lifting the mountain(let alone the mountain RANGE like some claim) when there's barely enough of a small space for the others not to get crushed.
Not only is it pretty clear, its stated on panel.
They dug out a wedge in the ground to not get crushed. All the Hulk was supporting was the small circular area above his, tony, reed and everyone else's head. The rest of the base was on solid ground.
Originally posted by CosmicCometCouldn't they just have made a big ass trench and be safe without Hulk needing to lift or support anything lol
Not only is it pretty clear, its stated on panel.They dug out a wedge in the ground to not get crushed. All the Hulk was supporting was the small circular area above his, tony, reed and everyone else's head. The rest of the base was on solid ground.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
Not only is it pretty clear, its stated on panel.They dug out a wedge in the ground to not get crushed. All the Hulk was supporting was the small circular area above his, tony, reed and everyone else's head. The rest of the base was on solid ground.
Yeah, but I was trying to be nice and not say, "Those people are idiots." Pointing-out EVERYTHING they miss, you've left me no choice.....
Originally posted by dmillsWhats so funny?
😂As for the thread, theoretically a few of them can. But unless I've missed something I can't recall having seen anything remotely close to that on panel. Outside of the All star Supes thing of course. I guess majestic would count as well. Maybe The plutonian with the gravity of a solar system feat.
Originally posted by dmillsBesides hulk pulling together tectonic plates to over power the planet from exploding?
There isn't a single basis for that claim.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Besides hulk pulling together tectonic plates to over power the planet from exploding?
Besides hulk one shotting a planatoid 2x earths mass that was moving toward earth at great speeds? That feat alone requires FAR more than 200 quintillion tons 😬
If Hulk did the asteroid thing on pure strength, instead of durability being a factor, why would he need help to get into orbit? Also, you're not taking into account that the speed the asteroid was moving at would've played a factor in it's destruction.
Originally posted by Delta1938Durability? He needed the rocket because he cant fly 😕
If Hulk did the asteroid thing on pure strength, instead of durability being a factor, why would he need help to get into orbit? Also, you're not taking into account that the speed the asteroid was moving at would've played a factor in it's destruction.
Unless you think the mere jet pack propelling hulk produced the kinetic force of 8 sextillion tons which is even more ridiculous than hulk using his dynamic strength to do it.
jet packs that can bust planets😕
If that was the case they didnt even need hulk.
Since when is any hulk durable enough to tank a planet ramming into him with no injury what so ever?
I dont see how the speed would play a factor in its destruction? If anything it GREATLY increase the total mass hulk had to overcome.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Or, Hulk only supported a small fraction of it, instead of actually lifting it up like people have claimed.
Originally posted by CosmicCometthat's what happened
This is something I've mentioned over and over in other threads yes, and could support the 150 billion ton figure.
molecule man dropped a mountain range on the avengers, and right before it touched down the heroes blasted a small area out of it and hulk braced the ceiling of it as it was crumbling. the portion he braced was stated to be miles of rock, obviously not the entire mountain range in total.
stop listening to morons, they only take intelligence away from you instead of giving you more, especially that phucking carver