Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Well that's the problem, isn't it? You can't ''show'' someone the way to think like you or to think so you'd agree with them. He's made a huge step in leaving a system of belief and taken one that is more suited to him. Not everyone is an atheist nor wants to be.
It reminds me of Christians who try to tell me why I'm wrong, or Muslims who tell me why their Islam is the right one and everyone else is wrong.This is his belief, and yes language barrier should be taken into consideration, considering he got attacked about how his list ''doesn't make sense''.
When people here who accused him of poor English are able to articulate as well in Arabic as he can do in English, perhaps then we can speak about his language barrier.
If something doesn't make sense, it doesn't make sense. It's not an attack. Me saying a particular sentence is incoherent is just stating a fact. Language barrier or not, again, that gap needs to be bridged before we can have a conversation. I realize it's difficult, but the alternative is just to ignore him. srug
Also, don't get too hung up on the word "show." I'm aware you can't force feed anyone beliefs. It wasn't meant in that way; just a arbitrary word choice that I didn't think too hard about when writing that sentence.
Originally posted by dadudemon
And, yes, his beliefs largely reflect my own and many atheists.
See, that's the thing. If your justification for a particular sect is such that it could apply to almost anything, it's not really a justification for a sect anymore. "I can think for myself" isn't an endorsement of anyone denomination, for example. If you're a certain denomination, that kind of implies that there's differences that make it superior in your eyes. As such, I'd think that you'd have to focus on the difference to explain why you are one denomination and not another.
So I don't think most of his points are bad - many are quite good - but I also think they're largely irrespective of one's religion.