Originally posted by quab
Okay, thanks for clearing things up for me 馃檪 I guess it can be debated on who is stronger between the two of them.
Unless and until one can argue that the Fulcrum is TOAA , then Scathan's feat destroys all narrative hyperbole(and even on-panel feats) on which Tiamut's reputation rests .
Originally posted by ctsketch
I thought it was already pretty clear that The Fulcrum was Jack the Bartender.......
And who exactly is Jack the Bartender ? If you're gonna argue that its Jack Kirby , then you'll need some solid on-panel proof to back up such a claim .
For all we know , the Fulcrum could infact be an incarnation of Eternity , as Eternity was showcased as the Celestials' creator in a Dr Strange comic .
Originally posted by TheGodKillerIs this a right way of thinking?
Unless and until one can argue that the Fulcrum is TOAA , then Scathan's feat destroys all narrative hyperbole(and even on-panel feats) on which Tiamut's reputation rests .
Tiamut is currently the strongest and Scathan will be the strongest later on?
Past vs. Future
Originally posted by vansonbee
Is this a right way of thinking?Tiamut is currently the strongest and Scathan will be the strongest later on?
Past vs. Future
Maybe .
However if it can be conclusively proven that Fulcrum is indeed TOAA , then I doubt that ANY Celestial(from the past , present or future) is stronger than Tiamut .