97 year old suspected nazi arrested in hungary

Started by super pr*xy2 pages

97 year old suspected nazi arrested in hungary

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/laszlo-csatary-97-year-old-hungarian-nazi-suspected-sending-15-700-jews-die-holocaust-detained-budapest-article-1.1116757

this old man allegedly ran a ghetto in slovakia and ordered 16,000 jews to their deaths.. he lived in canada for a while, then moved to hungary where he lived freely until now..

the saddest thing that i find about this, if all the allegations are true, is that he is way past the twilight of his life to fully serve what sentence is given to him.. as for his conscience, he was "just following orders".. justice delayed is justice denied..

I'm shocked that it took them this long to find him when he never changed his name in all these years.

I'm surprised they really give a shit about arresting him. He's going to die before he even gets sentenced. Who cares?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I'm shocked that it took them this long to find him when he never changed his name in all these years.

" But he escaped to Canada, where he lived under an assumed identity and worked as an art dealer in Toronto and Montreal.

His cover was blown in 1997, and he fled Canada as officials there were working to deport him."

Originally posted by Tzeentch._
I'm surprised they really give a shit about arresting him. He's going to die before he even gets sentenced. Who cares?

"One of the most effective ways to combat the rising wave of anti-Semitism, and extremism in Hungary is to put on trial a Hungarian who embraced anti-Semitic, genocidal hate a generation ago. His trial will serve as a warning for young people attracted to Hungary’s extreme far-right." -end snip

Putting a frail old man on trial for the media is a terrible way to get people to disagree with him. This is why we have secret prisons.

I can see a 97 year old being put on trial only galvanizing followers of that ideology.

I don't see how his age is an issue. Unless people get a free pass for mass-murder after a given length of time.

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't see how his age is an issue. Unless people get a free pass for mass-murder after a given length of time.

He'll look sympathetic which makes him a bad posterboy for evil.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
He'll look sympathetic which makes him a bad posterboy for evil.

Holocaust pictures and testimonials > sad old men.

Originally posted by Robtard
Holocaust pictures and testimonials > sad old men.

Not to neo-Nazis, who are supposed to the target of his trial.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Not to neo-Nazis, who are supposed to the target of his trial.

Not sure if the angle towards the Neo-Nazis is "being a Nazi is bad, so stop", more so than "this is what happens when you're a bad Nazi, so watch it."

What's the other option, let him go? What kind of message will that send.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure if the angle towards the Neo-Nazis is "being a Nazi is bad, so stop", more so than "this is what happens when you're a bad Nazi, so watch it."
I think even Neo-Nazis are smart enough to know that their idols are prosecuted and have been for decades. They'll chalk it up to Zionist machinations, sympathize with the torment of an old "hero" and reaffirm their beliefs. They've been doing that since the war ended.

Even if this guy were tried would anyone really give a damn. Not saying that he shouldn't answer for his crimes but what impact would killing a man who's already lived a life-time have on any Neo-Nazis? That you can commit hate crimes as long as nobody catches you? As the OP has stated above in this particular case that justice really has been denied.

Though I did learn from this article that being good at hide and seek + hatred and persecution of a distinct ethnic group= longlevity. Poor placed joke I know.

Don't see anything wrong with this. If nothing else any other survivors and families of the victims deserve to know that justice is done in the end. Similar to the Klan members who committed murders in the South during the civil rights era who weren't prosecuted until recently.

Is there anything positive that would come from deciding not to carry through with this?

not really hes almost dead, infact anything could give him a heart attack...if you think closely about it, maybe it was best for him? He gets taken care of, food and meal and gets a free bed? lol

even if he lives through the trial and found out to be guilty, i don't think he's gonna be put in general population anyway..

He worked for a different country under a different reign. We wouldn't execute U.S. citizens for ordering mass-murdering down in Iraq, would we?

Originally posted by Astner
He worked for a different country under a different reign. We wouldn't execute U.S. citizens for ordering mass-murdering down in Iraq, would we?

I think you mean non-US citizens there in order to make the parallel work.

But if one of our generals start ordering straight up genocide he'd at least be imprisoned for it.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I think you mean non-US citizens there in order to make the parallel work.

But if one of our generals start ordering straight up genocide he'd at least be imprisoned for it.

or possibly shot by his own men. 😎