It is a conspiracy. All I said was it was interesting. No one mentioned a girl being pulled out the back. Blood splatters seem to go toward the exit. Her sandles are there. There was a riot shield that was removed later.
Finally a new page that wasnt blown the **** up. Pretty sure its not the actually officers investigating it.
the police have revealed scant evidence about the event, so a girl being pulled from the theater is a possibility (though no witnesses have said anything similar), a conspiracy where the police are hiding what would otherwise be in their and the public's best interest to share... that seems a little silly and deliberately seeking of conspiracies.
If there was an accomplice, that shit would be all over every police statement in an attempt to get any information from the public, and the police are almost forced to release that info, as it is considered negligent not to warn the public of a mass murderer on the loose.
w/e, that infographic was amazing
What interested me that I didnt originally know about was the riot shield, the gas masks dropped position and the pink sandals which have, what it looks like to me, spreaded blood all over the area. I have no idea if there was a second shooter or not but that is probably less than likely. Can't say I have the answers. But feel free to jump to conclusions lol.
Lol omega, don't get too ahead of yourself. We all know you're my number 1 fan. stoned
the problem is, the shooting happened at 12:38-12:39am, those pictures are from the middle of the morning, at least, after the police had been there.
The sandals could have been moved for some reason, the shield and the mask could have come from the SWAT response, etc. However, the idea that the police, for no reason, would neglect to tell people about a criminal on the loose like this really stretches what I think is reasonable.
Like, is the ultimate conspiracy that the police are in on it for some reason? Why else would they hide this information? How do they keep it from the press FFS, think about how little they have been able to keep from the press at this point.
Would be pretty ****ing ground breaking news if the police were in on it. Thats definitely not the case lol.
I highly doubt they would move any of this stuff, especially in the position that they were shown in the photo. Why would a SWAT officer place his shield there? That makes no sense.
Everyone has their own take on it, everyone is posting their own videos of their own takes on it. I heard this and that and there are some way over the top conspiracies but it was the pictures in this video that showed stuff I had no clue about.
you think it is unexpected that, of the hundreds of officers that showed up that night, one or two might have put down their shield or mask? or that the sandals may have been moved by the forensics team? what if they needed casings that were under the sandals? what if the girl survived and wanted them back?
I'm just saying, the conclusion that the police are lying is based on evidence that I think could have any number of more mundane explanations.
like, seriously, what would be the purpose of the cover up?
Originally posted by Oliver North
you think it is unexpected that, of the hundreds of officers that showed up that night, one or two might have put down their shield or mask?
Its definitely unexpected, how can you think otherwise? Why, after the night has passed, would a SWAT officer leave his shield right on top of the crime scene? There were no SWAT officers even near that area while they were examining it on the photos. You have to be really stupid to believe a SWAT officer just left it there and went back to his vehicle.
Give me an example of why a SWAT team member would just leave it right there.
Originally posted by Oliver North
or that the sandals may have been moved by the forensics team? what if they needed casings that were under the sandals? what if the girl survived and wanted them back?
Lol you're definitely stretching on this one. Casings under the sandals? Really? What does the girl surviving and wanting them back have to do with anything?
I just got shot up and I was near someone with blood and all I want are my sandals back!
This isnt what I was addressing by the way. I wasn't aware of any child being carried out the back when I thought most people ran through the lobby. With the blood spreaded in that area it looks like a struggle but I could be wrong.
Originally posted by Oliver North
I'm just saying, the conclusion that the police are lying is based on evidence that I think could have any number of more mundane explanations.like, seriously, what would be the purpose of the cover up?
Idk, you tell me.
I dont feel the need to provide a reason for something I never claimed? Lol
Keep in mind I didnt create the video. If you understood what I wrote you'd notice what interested me was the photos in the video which pointed out what was out there.
The only photos ive been seeing is the blood splatters with all the evidence already removed.
"You have to be really stupid to believe a SWAT officer just left it there and went back to his vehicle."
Especially the fact that this was hours after Holmes capture. You seem to be gathering your own conclusions though. Must have some clumsy SWAT officers out there. "Oh yeah my job here is done, gee this shield is heavy.... F*ck it..."
Edit: To clear it up, I have no conclusions as to why the shield was there. It may have been holmes but i wasnt aware that he was equipped with one. It just seems Odd.
Originally posted by Oliver North
though, in this case, in a parallel universe where gun, ammo or armor sales were monitored, and where this package was found, it might have prevented it. Just a strange observation about how the dice are rolled or whatever.
I was thinking that a computer system could easily track this and set off an alarm for the authorities (local and FBI?) In fact, no loss of rights would be experienced, imo.
You'd just have to justify purchasing 3000 rounds of ammunition before you can complete the transaction.
But what about a limited amount of ammunition? You know, all it takes is 30 rounds to kill 30 people. Worst case scenario, you buy heavy rounds with high muzzle velocity, line people up, and kill 2 or 3 people at a time with each shot. 60-90 people dead?
So is it possible to to kill quite a few people with limited ammunition. Wouldn't the actions of the people just be slightly different if you set off read flags? What about those than can make their own ammunition? That doesn't stop someone with an internet connection.
But, I think your idea might be good...
Originally posted by dadudemonYou'd just have to justify purchasing 3000 rounds of ammunition before you can complete the transaction.
But what about a limited amount of ammunition? You know, all it takes is 30 rounds to kill 30 people. Worst case scenario, you buy heavy rounds with high muzzle velocity, line people up, and kill 2 or 3 people at a time with each shot. 60-90 people dead?
So is it possible to to kill quite a few people with limited ammunition. Wouldn't the actions of the people just be slightly different if you set off read flags? What about those than can make their own ammunition? That doesn't stop someone with an internet connection.
But, I think your idea might be good...
I think the realistic aim of gun control isn't to completely prevent tragedies like the Aurora shooting but to make it more difficult for a lone nutjob to pull them off without some thread of the safety net catching him beforehand.
The only people who would buy that many bullets are people who are (1) intensely serious about target shooting, (2) planning a shooting, or (3) planning to survive a zombie apocalypse