Destruction (Endless) Vs Lord Chaos

Started by Golgo131 pages

Destruction (Endless) Vs Lord Chaos

vs

destruction ftw, pretty sure the endless are multiversal beings

D.

Has Destruction ever done anything on panel?

Because as few as Lord Chaos' appearances are, at least he :
a) was 1/2 of the power needed to cure a dying Galactus
b) was 1/2 of the power needed to create the Inbetweener
c) went up against Thanos with the IG

Not impressive at all, but at least it's something.

What's Destruction's best feat?

Embodying every possible aspect of destruction(and creation) on a multiversal level.

Originally posted by Galan007
Embodying every possible aspect of destruction(and creation) on a multiversal level.

Yeah well the PF is supposed to embody all life yet unborn and is a multiversal psionic entity (according to it's special handbook entry) and look how that's working out for it. 😆

Lord Chaos wins or it's a draw.

Can LC even effect Destruction?

Originally posted by zopzop
Yeah well the PF is supposed to embody all life yet unborn and is a multiversal psionic entity (according to it's special handbook entry) and look how that's working out for it. 😆

Lord Chaos wins or it's a draw.

Comparing Destruction to a completely different character from a completely different company? Horrible analogy.

Destruction literally IS the concept he embodies on a conceptual level. Just like Dream, just like Death, just like ALL the Endless.

Originally posted by Galan007
Comparing Destruction to a completely different character from a completely different company? Horrible analogy.

Destruction literally IS the concept he embodies on a conceptual level. Just like Dream, just like Death, just like ALL the Endless.


So is the PF. The point I was trying to make is : without ANY on panel feats, fights, whatever; titles (especially for non omnipotents) are meaningless.

Originally posted by zopzop
So is the PF. The point I was trying to make is : without ANY on panel feats, fights, whatever; titles (especially for non omnipotents) are meaningless.
This is the problem. People treat the Endless as characters first, and concepts second-- which is completely incorrect. It should be the other way around.

Every single act of devastation/annihilation/carnage/wreckage/ruin/massacre/etc. that has taken place throughout the Vertigo/DC multiverse IS Destruction of the Endless. He embodies it ALL. Dianna snapping Max's neck? Destruction. Prime killing a plethora of heroes? Destruction. AM laying waste to the multiverse? Destruction. Batman sodomizing Robin? Destruction. Etc.

This is a hard concept for most to grasp, but the Endless are uber like that.

Originally posted by Galan007
This is the problem. People treat the Endless as characters first, and concepts second-- which is completely incorrect. It should be the other way around.

Every single act of devastation/annihilation/carnage/wreckage/ruin/massacre/etc. that has taken place throughout the Vertigo/DC multiverse IS Destruction of the Endless. He embodies it ALL. Dianna snapping Max's neck? Destruction. Prime killing a plethora of heroes? Destruction. AM laying waste to the multiverse? Destruction. Batman sodomizing Robin? Destruction. Etc.

This is a hard concept for most to grasp, but the Endless are uber like that.


Barring idiot writers, all abstracts by definition are like that. And again, that didn't save the PF (just an example, there are more), why should it save Destruction?

It's indisputable that he done exactly ZER0 on panel. Lord Chaos has at least DONE something on panel.

Originally posted by zopzop
Barring idiot writers, all abstracts by definition are like that. And again, that didn't save the PF (just an example, there are more), why should it save Destruction?

It's indisputable that he done exactly ZER0 on panel. Lord Chaos has at least DONE something on panel.

Difference between the Endless and the "other abstracts" is that the Endless are ALWAYS written the way I described.

Either way, feel free to ignore how the Endless were consistently portrayed, in favor of how your personally feel they should be ranked... But frankly, I find the notion that a multiversal entity (Destruction) cannot defeat a low-level universal abstract (Chaos), lulz-worthy. /shrug

Destruction also.

Originally posted by Galan007
But frankly, I find the notion that a multiversal entity (Destruction) cannot defeat a low-level universal abstract (Chaos), lulz-worthy. /shrug

pretty much.

Originally posted by Galan007
Batman sodomizing Robin? Destruction.

lol