Death vs Fulcrum

Started by keiththegreat1 pages
keiththegreat Senior Member

Death vs Fulcrum

Death as seen at the end of Thanos Imperative

vs

Fulcrum

TheGodKiller True Killer

If Fulcrum is indeed what Gaiman alluded him to be , then this is spite against Death .

Nihilist Senior Member

Fulcrum did nothing impressive

PillarofOsiris Senior Member

Didn't he claim that he created the Celestials? At the very least I think he's eternity, but I think it was strongly implied that he was supposed to be the actual One Above All (just the impression I got from Tiamut's conversation with the Watcher). If so it's definitely spite against Death.

TheGodKiller True Killer

Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
Didn't he claim that he created the Celestials? At the very least I think he's eternity, but I think it was strongly implied that he was supposed to be the actual One Above All (just the impression I got from Tiamut's conversation with the Watcher). If so it's definitely spite against Death.

He may have been an aspect of Eternity for all we know . However , with all the "Jack the Bartender" sh!t , there was a very strong allusion to it being the Jack Kirby avatar/real TOAA .

ctsketch Senior Member

It's implied the Fulcrum is jack the bartender aka TOAA

Branlor Swift Dead

He had the power to ascend Tiamut, and then descend him immediately after... according to comic timelines.

bbrem123 Senior Member

yea he was at least beyond Tiamut