Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
it doesn't even matter who won the debate, Obama will get his second term unless something mad happens
+1
Completely Agreed, Obama could have been more aggressive. He is more famous worldwide than most politicians in the USA or in the world. Ask anyone from anywhere in the world (within reason) and they most likely have heard of Obama and can tell you who he is.
that's going off topic, anyway In my opinion Obama will get a second term. 🙄
I don't always agree with TJ, but I think he got it totally bang on here
EDIT: "But if you expect to see considerable economic improvement under either of these men, then you are smoking more potent drugs than I even knew existed"
+1 TJ, +1
Originally posted by Oliver North
YouTube videoI don't always agree with TJ, but I think he got it totally bang on here
EDIT: "But if you expect to see considerable economic improvement under either of these men, then you are smoking more potent drugs than I even knew existed"
+1 TJ, +1
I stopped the video when he started talking about Bain Capital...in very ignorant statements. No reason to waste my time on a video that is full of such opening ignorance.
Originally posted by Lestov16Seriously?
YouTube video
Originally posted by Oliver North
You don't have a problem with things like Bain?
I believe I stated that I had a problem with the ignorance presented in the video...so much so that I just could not justify watching it beyond...what?....50 seconds?
Originally posted by Oliver North
like, outside of Romney, the whole existence of they type of company?EDIT: lol, also, looks like I hit a nerve
Don't hurt yourself by trying to inappropriately pat yourself on the back. At least not just yet.
I think you missed the point entirely.
Have you been following the "nuances" of the campaigns?
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/romneys-bain-years-new-evidence-same-conclusion/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/bain-still-no-evidence/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/lemon-picking-bain-capital-obama-style/
http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-outsourcer-overreach/
For me, this is old news. yawn
Originally posted by dadudemon
I believe I stated that I had a problem with the ignorance presented in the video...so much so that I just could not justify watching it beyond...what?....50 seconds?Don't hurt yourself by trying to inappropriately pat yourself on the back. At least not just yet.
I think you missed the point entirely.
Have you been following the "nuances" of the campaigns?
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/romneys-bain-years-new-evidence-same-conclusion/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/bain-still-no-evidence/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/factcheck-to-obama-camp-your-complaint-is-all-wet/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/lemon-picking-bain-capital-obama-style/
http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-outsourcer-overreach/
For me, this is old news. yawn
lol, I'm surprised you didn't turn it off when he suggested Mitt Romney sold the woman's daughters into slavery...
I imagine you got through, what, 2 min of the debate? considering how terrible you find embellishment
EDIT: my point being, way to feign outrage over a comment made in passing as part of a larger point regarding venture capital firms...
You know we have laws that would kill Bain and any other company practicing Vulture/Cancer Capitalism and solve many problems that are currently being pursued by new legislation. They aren't enforced and that's the problem. It's illegal to big to fail. It's illegal to merge with or acquire a business with a loan (this would put Bain out of business).
If we had a President who as the head of the Executive Branch would simply enforce the anti-trust laws passed in this country we would have a severe labor shortage, followed by a housing shortage, followed by an economic surplus within the next four years. No more supply side bullshit, full dereaganization.
We need a president that understands that the rich aren't job creators, consumers are. What better way to recover the economy than by breaking and selling off or nationalizing large companies and making monetary policy based on the tying inflation to wages rather than prices.
Originally posted by Oliver North
lol, I'm surprised you didn't turn it off when he suggested Mitt Romney sold the woman's daughters into slavery...
But....but...that was funny. I thought it was going to be a funny video that makes some really good points with heaping scoops of humor.
Then it took a turn into libtardedness.
Originally posted by Oliver North
I imagine you got through, what, 2 min of the debate? considering how terrible you find embellishment
No, I got through the whole debate. The lies are much easier to tolerate because they are the actual candidates: something I expect from both.
Originally posted by Oliver North
EDIT: my point being, way to feign outrage over a comment made in passing as part of a larger point regarding venture capital firms...
Sorry, didn't make it that far into the video. 🙂 And it wasn't rage. It was disgust...or smugness. Take your pick.
Thought some of you fellas might get a kick out of this. Can't say how much of it is accurate.
Originally posted by dadudemon
But....but...that was funny. I thought it was going to be a funny video that makes some really good points with heaping scoops of humor.Then it took a turn into libtardedness.
A video you admit to watching ~10% of...
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, I got through the whole debate. The lies are much easier to tolerate because they are the actual candidates: something I expect from both.
idk. I watch TYT daily and find myself constantly face palming or yelling at my monitor in rage...
I suppose taste is personal, but someone making a point I disagree with or that I think is in error rarely makes me "turn off" what they are saying. That you would ragequit the video, mid sentence, before the point about venture capital was even made, sort of seems like... lets say a "heightened sensitivity"?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Sorry, didn't make it that far into the video. 🙂 And it wasn't rage. It was disgust...or smugness. Take your pick.
haha, no, I was more commenting on the very quick replies from you and Mariuzu that were also very negative
Originally posted by Oliver North
A video you admit to watching ~10% of...
I think you think that means, "you watched the whole video and are asserting that the whole video is libtarded." Sorry, nope.jpg.
I seriously stopped watching it when he, "took a turn into libtardedness."
Originally posted by Oliver North
idk. I watch TYT daily and find myself constantly face palming or yelling at my monitor in rage...I suppose taste is personal, but someone making a point I disagree with or that I think is in error rarely makes me "turn off" what they are saying. That you would ragequit the video, mid sentence, before the point about venture capital was even made, sort of seems like... lets say a "heightened sensitivity"?
TJ: probably does not matter when it comes to the presidential election.
Obama and Romney debates: they probably matter when it comes to the presidential election.
So why would you equate the two? That seems rather absurd. They are certainly not equally important to me and they definitely shouldn't be to anyone who has an interest in US Politics.
Does that now make sense why I tolerate bullshit from debates but not an entertainer from Youtube? I hope that makes sense.
When it come to political stuff, if someone starts spouting off bullshit political rhetoric, it is an instant turn off and I stop listening. I value facts and accuracy greatly over bullshit political rhetoric. I do not have that luxury with family but I certainly do have that luxury with youtube videos. 🙂 (That could mean...gaspity...that I consider you like family because I tolerate political bullshit from you and even talk about it!!!! Welcome to da family: don't insult our spaghetti.)
Originally posted by Oliver North
haha, no, I was more commenting on the very quick replies from you and Mariuzu that were also very negative
We are quite negative ****ers, as of late. Probably because we are butthurt that Ron Paul is not going to be the president and we have two shit candidates. WHERE ARE THOSE DAMN OPINIONS????