Originally posted by The ScenarioI accepted a battlezone against him because I beat that game you nitwit. Its a shitty franchise. I remember playing the first two but not many details since it was so long ago. Crappy franchise. Nintendo is a weak company with stupid characters who appeal to children.
Why did you accept a Ganondorf Battlezone when you knew nothing about him? In any case, you're calling franchises and characters you don't know weak and/or shitty. Play a game and get back to me, or allow me to educate you. It'll be easy.Normal thread, then. Voldemort, Russell Edgington, and Khan gauntlet against Samus. Or perhaps they team up against her? It won't make a difference.
EDIT:
It's basically a judged versus thread. Only two posters are allowed to post, and each represents a character. Three judges are chosen, and then they decide the winner based on who put forth the most convincing argument.
Get over the fact Nintendo will eventually fail and I'll be there to piss on the ashes.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So we were right, you lost, Ganon crushed Russell and Scen crushed you.Any questions?
Originally posted by Digi------
Quan rightly called .
.
----------
Quan actually maximized his character more.--------Scenario left some versatility on the table, like the intangibility in the OP, which he barely used after mentioning it. Knowing what I know now, it seems like it was an uphill battle for Quan, who made the most of his opportunity but couldn't overcome an inherently more powerful character. Video game logic didn't help, because things like disintegrating pillars by running through them is something that's incredibly hard to match in a live-action TV show.
Good job to both.
I out debated the shit out of him. I'm a far better debater. The fact Bloodrain and others said it was close when they said it was spite prior to proves this.
Nuff said, troll.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteAgain, everyone said it was spite. Lol. The fact many said I outdebated him because I completely did. He tried bullshit and was called on it. I mean you said the matchup was spite so you agree he had to have screwed up the debate if it was close at all.
Lost. Claims to be superior. Won't BZ him again.Lol.
But who cares your sissy ass won't ever do one. You're a coward through and through. I'm the man.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Again, everyone said it was spite. Lol. The fact many said I outdebated him because I completely did. He tried bullshit and was called on it. I mean you said the matchup was spite so you agree he had to have screwed up the debate if it was close at all.But who cares your sissy ass won't ever do one. You're a coward through and through. I'm the man.
True or False?
