Originally posted by Sacred 117
This new discussion slightly confuses Sacred.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Confuses and arouses or just confuses? 131
YouTube video
YouTube video
Originally posted by Sacred 117
This new discussion slightly confuses Sacred.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Confuses and arouses or just confuses? 131
Originally posted by BloodRain
Hey man been all for it for the last few weeks :3 Just dont want to end up pulling a.. well.. a you 😛(<3)
Come, let me show you the ways.
Lol, that's not the problem. Though I do applaud you. 😄 I'm just wondering what you're worried about, and what Scream was talking about. Lol.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerNope, since it was a theoretical point you didn't understand. You just jump into debates without being aware of what's going on too often.
Go ahead. You'll only further validate my point, you hypocritical coward. Basically speaking, you'll just add more fuel to the fire.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Nope, since it was a theoretical point you didn't understand.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You just jump into debates without being aware of what's going on too often.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerNo, I said it is possible to out debating but losing the outcome.
You conceded that Russell is to Dorf what Thor is to the LT. This'll forever be remembered as the day when you betrayed one your faves. Shameful. 👇Irony. 😂
The quote was put up. You lying because you're upset won't change anything, noob.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I said it is possible to out debating but losing the outcome.The quote was put up. You lying because you're upset won't change anything, noob.
I didn't lie. You admit that Digi's logic about Ganon being an inherently more powerful character is correct. You lost. You conceded. You fled. Time to move on.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerNo, you lied. I already responded to this multiple times. Get a life and quit hanging off my nuts.
You did so by equating the difference between Russell and Dorf like the difference between a high herald and a high Abstract. That there say it all.I didn't lie. You admit that Digi's logic about Ganon being an inherently more powerful character is correct. You lost. You conceded. You fled. Time to move on.
No, I said me out debating him is correct. I disagree with his views on Dorf, manwithoutalifeofhisown.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you lied. I already responded to this multiple times. Get a life and quit hanging off my nuts.No, I said me out debating him is correct. I disagree with his views on Dorf, manwithoutalifeofhisown.
No, see this isn't how debating works. You can't pick and choose someone's opinions to agree with. If he says that Dorf is an inherently more powerful character than Russell that no matter how good of a debater you are, you never have a hope of winning, then you don't just stick to the good debater part and ignore the inherently more powerful part.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerI never made that comparison.
According to your logic, Russell is to Dorf what Thor is to the LT. That means Russell can never stand a chance against Dorf in a forum match. Horrible.No, see this isn't how debating works. You can't pick and choose someone's opinions to agree with. If he says that Dorf is an inherently more powerful character than Russell that no matter how good of a debater you are, you never have a hope of winning, then you don't just stick to the good debater part and ignore the inherently more powerful part.
Life is grey I can pick and choose whatever I want to. I mean do you honestly believe life is black and white ? I fear for your weak mind.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never made that comparison.Life is grey I can pick and choose whatever I want to. I mean do you honestly believe life is black and white ? I fear for your weak mind.
Non-sequiter. You can't selectively pick what you like and ignore what you don't like. What you did in regards to Digi's post is called quote-mining. That's a very dishonest debating tactic. Not surprised that it came from you.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerNo, I did not.
You did so.Non-sequiter. You can't selectively pick what you like and ignore what you don't like. What you did in regards to Digi's post is called quote-mining. That's a very dishonest debating tactic. Not surprised that it came from you.
Yes, I can pick and choose what I agree with from a post. You did it today you hypocrite and then begged Galan to forgive you. You are such a wimp anymore.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I did not.Yes, I can pick and choose what I agree with from a post. You did it today you hypocrite and then begged Galan to forgive you. You are such a wimp anymore.
Then you concede that you engage in dishonest tactics like quote-mining. Nope, I misread Galan's post and clarified the subsequent misunderstanding between us, like real men. Everyone can't be a cavemanish troll like you, quan.