Thor vs Wonder Woman

Started by JakeTheBank2 pages
Originally posted by Stoic
I really wasn't joking. All of these BS KO's that Thor has taken over the past couple months, really ignore his vast showings of taking greater heat than the shots that have put him out.

Which can either be reconciled as PIS for the reasons you just stated or simply really low showings that ignore the vast quantity of feats he has under his belt. Still canon, of course, but when taken against the feats of his within the past two years per the OP, not really an accurate representation of Thor's ultimate capabilities. And in the grand scheme of things as a whole, barely a blip on his decades worth of showings.

So, yeah, if someone wants to make a case of cherry picking low/embarassing feats of Thor to justify DCnU Diana winning, they obviously can, but it doesn't make sense to do so.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Which can either be reconciled as PIS for the reasons you just stated or simply really low showings that ignore the vast quantity of feats he has under his belt. Still canon, of course, but when taken against the feats of his within the past two years per the OP, not really an accurate representation of Thor's ultimate capabilities. And in the grand scheme of things as a whole, barely a blip on his decades worth of showings.

So, yeah, if someone wants to make a case of cherry picking low/embarassing feats of Thor to justify DCnU Diana winning, they obviously can, but it doesn't make sense to do so.

It's not PIS, it's the writers. Many of these guys don't or have not followed the history of the character. Then again just look at what they've been doing to adamantium. Pretty soon, they'll be guys breaking Wolverines bones like toothpicks.