God Blast Vs.......

Started by abhilegend4 pages

Originally posted by eaebiakuya
Lol. You talking about someone who was ready to bust the entire multiverse.

A Cosmic entitie tanked a herald level blast prove whats.


Hyperbole.

That the galactus from 4 decades prior who was compared to a watcher in power and who was getting his shit pushed in by Ego running away from GB isn't comparable to current galactus who vaporises watchers as a side effect.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Hyperbole.

That the galactus from 4 decades prior who was compared to a watcher in power and who was getting his shit pushed in by Ego running away from GB isn't comparable to current galactus who vaporises watchers as a side effect.

Good point.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Hyperbole.

That the galactus from 4 decades prior who was compared to a watcher in power and who was getting his shit pushed in by Ego running away from GB isn't comparable to current galactus who vaporises watchers as a side effect.

No, it was not a hyperbole. The Oblivion was ready to take the reality for himself - and thats only happens when the multiverse is destroyed.

I Agree Galactus had a lot of low showings in the past, but most of then was when he was very starving.

But actual Galactus beated Celestiais, outlasted everyone in Cancerverse battle, etc.

A well fed Galactus will never be affected by any herald level power. Even a kamikaze Odin headbutt dont did much to a hungry version.

Lets not talk about a well fed (the one who receveid a amped godblast).

Say a well fed Galactus tanking a amped godblast is a bad feat for that, is non sense.

Originally posted by eaebiakuya
No, it was not a hyperbole. The Oblivion was ready to take the reality for himself - and thats only happens when the multiverse is destroyed.

I Agree Galactus had a lot of low showings in the past, but most of then was when he was very starving.

But actual Galactus beated Celestiais, outlasted everyone in Cancerverse battle, etc.

A well fed Galactus will never be affected by any herald level power. Even a kamikaze Odin headbutt dont did much to a hungry version.

Lets not talk about a well fed (the one who receveid a amped godblast).

Say a well fed Galactus tanking a amped godblast is a bad feat for that, is non sense.


Still a hyperbole.

You missed my point, galactus at the time when he nearly died from GB is very different than current galactus even in hungry state. Untill Byrne made him a third constant of the universe alongside eternity and death, galactus was no more powerful than a watcher even in fed state on general. Current galactus is far more powerful than in his past portrayals especially against herald level guys.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
It was a weakened Godblast as well.

No it wasn't. It had EXACTLY the same power that was used on Galactus. This is because the writer wanted it to be that way.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Thor was having seizures and clearly wasn't in the best health prior to using the Godblast. The Godblast itself relies on Thor's vitality and life force as fuel. Ergo, it makes sense that the Godblast he used wasn't his most powerful.

Not only that, but like Carver said, classic Juggernaut tanking an attack doesn't invalidate its power level, especially considering his durability/force field and the fact the the Godblast has consistently messed up people well above heralds.

In comics a character can be weakened and yet perform above standards. Writer's intentions>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>our speculations.

Originally posted by h1a8
No it wasn't. It had EXACTLY the same power that was used on Galactus. This is because the writer wanted it to be that way.

Yes, it was.

The Godblast is directly tied into Thor's life force/vitality.

When Thor used GB on Juggernaut he was ill, it states in the comic. GB fueled off of Thor's life force and godly energies and magnified through mjloner, Thor healthy was diminish in that arch, he could barley lifted a train car, so his GB would suffer from him not being 100%. GB caused Juggernaut to go backwards and causing him vertigo speaks volume on the power of GB.

Sidenote, Cyttorak durability is not greater than Galactus.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Merged hulk nearly twoshotted him

Nope

Originally posted by the Darkone
When Thor used GB on Juggernaut he was ill, it states in the comic. GB fueled off of Thor's life force and godly energies and magnified through mjloner, Thor healthy was diminish in that arch, he could barley lifted a train car, so his GB would suffer from him not being 100%. GB caused Juggernaut to go backwards and causing him vertigo speaks volume on the power of GB.

Sidenote, Cyttorak durability is not greater than Galactus.

It's interesting that, when Thor used the Godblast against Exitar, he was concerned that Mjolnir would be unable to contain all the energes expended from his lifeforce. When he used it against Juggernaut, though, he had no such worries and did not opt to protect/enhance the hammer w/ his belt of strength.

Originally posted by Starscream M
oh give it a rest jake, and stop making lame unprovable excuses

that was the same godblast as the others, it wasn't stated to be weaker.

also, Im not invalidating its power, but to point out it isn't a translevel attack as someone stated, since a translevel attack should hurt juggernaut


Lol a bigger tard than carver right here.

Thor did actually state that he was feeling better after his seizures and seemed at full health again when he encountered Juggs for the second time. That being said resisting the godblast is Juggernauts most impressive durability feat.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Thor did actually state that he was feeling better after his seizures and seemed at full health again when he encountered Juggs for the second time. That being said resisting the godblast is Juggernauts most impressive durability feat.

👆

Thor was fine
Thor said he was fine
Thor looked like he was fine
Thor acted like he was fine

Therefore the Godblast was full power

Originally posted by juggerman
👆

Therefore the Godblast was full power

Not necessarily. In the scan I posted earlier, Thor states "not even sacred Mjolnir can safely contain such energies"; and he proceeds to wrap his belt of strength around it. Subsequent to that, Mjolnir is, in fact, SHATTERED. That's significant! It shows that even the Godblast can be used at varying degrees of power. That the hammer was not destroyed when Thor used it against Juggernaut coupled with the fact that he didn't even bother to protect it w/ the aforementioned belt suggests that the Godblast Thor used against Juggernaut was -- at least -- less powerful than the force he attacked Exitar with. Both stories were written by the same author as well, that is, Tom DeFalco.

How was the hammer fixed?

Re: God Blast Vs.......

Originally posted by Sh3nG L0nG
I've heard many a time that the God Blast is the most powerful attack by anyone in the herald class and below. my question is, where would rank superman's FTL planet busting attacks? the one where he flies through a massively large object at FTL speed and destroys. should he choose to use this tactic on another character, would it be as devastating as a GB?
provide your reasons for or against.

where he gets KO'd in the process?

Originally posted by juggerman
How was the hammer fixed?

In the aftermath, a Celestial who took on the physical form of Thor greeted him and basically said the Celestials respected his bond with the hammer. They then proceeded to heal his wounds and fix Mjolnir. He was very happy.

Re: Re: God Blast Vs.......

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
where he gets KO'd in the process?

most über attacks leave characters drained, in the same scans posted above Thor look pretty drained after GB. That's besides the point, whether superman gets knocked out does not take away the devastating nature of the attack.

Originally posted by Doon
Not necessarily. In the scan I posted earlier, Thor states "not even sacred Mjolnir can safely contain such energies"; and he proceeds to wrap his belt of strength around it. Subsequent to that, Mjolnir is, in fact, SHATTERED. That's significant! It shows that even the Godblast can be used at varying degrees of power. That the hammer was not destroyed when Thor used it against Juggernaut coupled with the fact that he didn't even bother to protect it w/ the aforementioned belt suggests that the Godblast Thor used against Juggernaut was -- at least -- less powerful than the force he attacked Exitar with. Both stories were written by the same author as well, that is, Tom DeFalco.

Look at the scan again you see the gauntlets were destroyed in the process, they were designed to protect Thor hands, you can see they utter destroyed.

So in conclusion, the two stories from the same writer. Show us that their are different levels of the GB depending on Thor health, when he is not health or 100% his GB power out drops dramatically, when he is Health is causes some serious problems for Sky Fathers and above. Thor's GB did some damage in Thor Annual!!!

Originally posted by the Darkone
Look at the scan again you see the gauntlets were destroyed in the process, they were designed to protect Thor hands, you can see they utter destroyed.

So in conclusion, the two stories from the same writer. Show us that their are different levels of the GB depending on Thor health, when he is not health or 100% his GB power out drops dramatically, when he is Health is causes some serious problems for Sky Fathers and above. Thor's GB did some damage in Thor Annual!!!

I don't really think his physical health is a factor since the Godblast seems to draw upon his lifeforce energies within. In my opinion, Thor has the ability to gauge how powerful he wants the Godblast to be. For instance, if you look closely at the scan where he took on Exitar, Thor uttered very special words to enhance his godforce prior to unleashing it. When he took on Juggernaut, though, there was virtually no prep time. He just aimed and fired.

I agree with Doon. I think Thor can control how powerful the blast is.