Spider-man vs The Amazing Spider-man

Started by Vensai2 pages
Vensai Senior Member

I feel the new film will probably improve with sequels, but for now, the old spider has my vote.

pym-ftw Mizukage

I hated TAS, that said the trilogy had low points

Power Ranger Norman
Harry
Eric Foreman/Topher Grace as Venom? Why?

But atleast I felt like the movies aren't only being made so Fox can keep the rights

iscaremonkeys Senior Member

Spider-man 2002

Based iPinoy

I like Garfield and Stone better but IMO the effects were fvcking horrendous. Original for me. But it's close.

tkitna Senior Member

Original for me. I liked Toby way better. I thought he portrayed Parker as he should he been. Meek.

Vensai Senior Member

Originally posted by tkitna
Original for me. I liked Toby way better. I thought he portrayed Parker as he should he been. Meek.

Toby certainly portrayed the conflict between responsibilities and difficulties of being Parker better.

Arachnid1 Senior Member

Garfield was a better Parker and Spidey so the hero was better, but the older trilogy had better villains. I'm going to go with TAS. Villains can always improve, but the hero you establish is here to stay.

Mr Parker Senior Member

No constest.ASM was better than all 3 of those crapfest spiderman movies.It helps as well that they had someone to play the part who can act.

Tobey Goober Mcguire was about the worst casting choice for that role.for anyone to vote for that crapfest man-spider movie,they got bad taste in movies.that monstrocity power rangers goblin costume made that movie a joke.

JayDaDon World Champion
Originally posted by tkitna
Original for me. I liked Toby way better. I thought he portrayed Parker as he should he been. Meek.

I hated the way tobey played parker. Parker is patient and will take some crap, but he's nobody's doormat, like tobey portrayed him. He has his dignity and in the comics he frequently told people who annoyed or crossed him to take a flying leap.