Originally posted by dadudemon
Wrong: that feat is in line, very nicely math-wise, with a statement Edward made in Twilight (the first one): Vampires are a thousand or thousands of times stronger than humans (I do not remember which...but 1000 is just enough to make my point about the 200-4000 tonne force feat with the tree).
If that wasn't a non sequitur and you're claiming Law doesn't have the strength to break Edward, you're wrong, as shown.
Originally posted by Robtard
If that wasn't a non sequitur and you're claiming Law doesn't have the strength to break Edward, you're wrong, as shown.
He doesn't. It takes the strength of a Twilight Vampire to break Edward: Yu Law did not show that strength anywhere near that of a Twivamp.
Too bad, good sir! You tried. 🙁
Originally posted by Lestov16
I'd probably say 10 tons as well. But isn't that sufficient to push down a tree just as easy as Edward?
No, not the tree that Edward pushed down. But, yes, smaller trees in looser dirt, that would be sufficient.
Originally posted by Mindset
Nope, it takes the strength to break granite to break Edward.Yu Law 10/10.
Nope, it takes the strength of a Twivamp to break Edward. It was taking all of her (Victoria's) strength to try and pull Edward's head off. The granite stuff is just a metaphor for "really f**kin' durable". Bella also refers to Edward as "diamond" hard, as well. Also, she refers to Edward as "bullet proof'. Granite would shatter or crumble if shot with a bullet...at least it would pulverize a bit at the point of impact.
So now what?
What else you got? 🙂
Originally posted by dadudemon
He doesn't. It takes the strength of a Twilight Vampire to break Edward: Yu Law did not show that strength anywhere near that of a Twivamp.Too bad, good sir! You tried.
Wolfboys have no problem snapping them apart either and I've yet to see the Wolfboys swing around motorcycles like wiffle ball bats, bend prison bars, knock down steel poles and make indents in concrete with a foot stomp.
Tried? More like ripped apart and slaughtered with facts. Good day!
Originally posted by Robtard
Wolfboys have no problem snapping them apart either and I've yet to see the Wolfboys swing around motorcycles like wiffle ball bats, bend prison bars, knock down poles and make indents in concrete with a foot stomp.
1. Point me to anything that has torn apart a Vampire other than a Vampire or a Werewolf. Also, Werewolves are pretty much anti-Vampire units. You're using this argument, "This superhuman and mystical creature can harm X...and they happen to be anti-X units. So ha! X can be harmed by simple ol' superhuman-mystical creatures! Take that! Nya nya!" Derpy do? Derp do.
2. And in the books; which the movie missed, which you'll cry about because you're too much of a pansy to have this debate convo in the AvF where Edward isn't gimped by even shittier writing and "directing" than the books; only Vampire teeth and werewolf teeth are strong enough to break vampire skin. This was made known when nothing would cut open Bella's womb which had "vampirized" when they were trying an emergency c-section.
3. I dare you to make this thread in the AvF. 🙂
Originally posted by Robtard
Tried? More like ripped apart and slaughtered with facts. Good day!
Hardly. You...aren't even holding a candle to me. The coroner is going to have to bring a shovel to put you in the body bag because I just destroyed you again.
Originally posted by dadudemon
1. Point me to anything that has torn apart a Vampire other than a Vampire or a Werewolf. Also, Werewolves are pretty much anti-Vampire units. You're using this argument, "This superhuman and mystical creature can harm X...and they happen to be anti-X units. So ha! X can be harmed by simple ol' superhuman-mystical creatures! Take that! Nya nya!" Derpy do? Derp do.2. And in the books; which the movie missed, which you'll cry about because you're too much of a pansy to have this debate convo in the AvF where Edward isn't gimped by even shittier writing and "directing" than the books; only Vampire teeth and werewolf teeth are strong enough to break vampire skin. This was made known when nothing would cut open Bella's womb which had "vampirized" when they were trying an emergency c-section.
3. I dare you to make this thread in the AvF. 🙂
Hardly. You...aren't even holding a candle to me. The coroner is going to have to bring a shovel to put you in the body bag because I just destroyed you again.
1) So no, the werewolves haven't shown strength comparable to Law in terms of feats in the films. Sorry, you lose.
2) You know books don't count here. Strike two.
3) Why would I? I've not read the books (I'm straight) so I couldn't objectively debate them. Strike three.
LoL, I just spanked you there more times above. Better get some cream for that sore bottom.
Originally posted by Robtard
1) So no, the werewolves haven't shown strength comparable to Law in terms of feats. Sorry, you lose.
How would they go about doing that, good sir? Where are those opposible thumbs?
I think tearing apart a vampire shows far greater strength that Yu-Law ever shows. But that's just facts. You don't deal in facts.
Originally posted by Robtard
2) You know books don't count here.
So I take that as a "no, I will not start an AvF thread because I know I'll get my ass handed to me in every which way"? :'D
Originally posted by Robtard
3) Why would I? I've not read the books so I couldn't debate them and I've no doubt they're more powerful in the books.
lol
Figures. Hide behind the gimped versions of the characters.
Originally posted by dadudemon
How would they go about doing that, good sir? Where are those opposible thumbs?I think tearing apart a vampire shows far greater strength that Yu-Law ever shows. But that's just facts. You don't deal in facts.
So I take that as a "no, I will not start an AvF thread because I know I'll get my ass handed to me in every which way"? :'D
lol
Figures. Hide behind the gimped versions of the characters.
Ah, the circular argument. Sorry, movie feats > your wishes.
Incorrect again, you should take it as noted: "I've not read the book so I couldn't be objective and fair". You should some of that juicy objectively, instead of the Twilight Fanboy arguments.
You mean hiding behind the rules of the MVF. Sure, guilty of that.
Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, the circular argument. Sorry, movie feats > your wishes.
You didn't read, then. I provided a nice in-mobie rebuttal: you did not provide an reply to that.
Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect again, you should take it as noted: "I've not read the book so I couldn't be objective and fair". You should some of that juicy objectively, instead of the Twilight Fanboy arguments.
Nothing of substance, here. You literally added nothign to the discussion and are pretending my arguments amounted to just me pounding my chest with a demand of you posting an AvF thread. teehee. You're off your game, broseph.
Originally posted by Robtard
You mean hiding behind the rules of the MVF. Sure, guilty of that.
You actually think this is a "good" reply. Just sad, man. Well, at least you admit to hiding.
Originally posted by dadudemonYu Law can break diamonds and things that are bullet proof.
Nope, it takes the strength of a Twivamp to break Edward. It was taking all of her (Victoria's) strength to try and pull Edward's head off. The granite stuff is just a metaphor for "really f**kin' durable". Bella also refers to Edward as "diamond" hard, as well. Also, she refers to Edward as "bullet proof'. Granite would shatter or crumble if shot with a bullet...at least it would pulverize a bit at the point of impact.So now what?
What else you got? 🙂
Yu Law 10/10.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You didn't read, then. I provided a nice in-mobie rebuttal: you did not provide an reply to that.Nothing of substance, here. You literally added nothign to the discussion and are pretending my arguments amounted to just me pounding my chest with a demand of you posting an AvF thread. teehee. You're off your game, broseph.
You actually think this is a "good" reply. Just sad, man. Well, at least you admit to hiding.
Nope. You're circling, cos the wolves have no feats and you know this.
Nope. You "dared" me to make a thread, one of which you think you can win. I refused for obvious reasons, I have no knowledge of one side (book Twilight). I don't debate unless I know both sides, cos I am honest and fair and made of awesome. You should strive to be like me.
Pointing out that I'm following the rules while mocking you was the correct reply. So I win again.
Robtard: 9,769 Dadudemon: 0
Originally posted by Robtard
Nope. You're circling, cos the wolves have no feats and you know this.
Wrong:
"Nope, it takes the strength of a Twivamp to break Edward. It was taking all of her (Victoria's) strength to try and pull Edward's head off."
"You didn't read, then. I provided a nice in-mobie rebuttal: you did not provide an reply to that."
"Bella also refers to Edward as "diamond" hard, as well. Also, she refers to Edward as "bullet proof'."
"I think tearing apart a vampire shows far greater strength that Yu-Law ever shows."
"Point me to anything that has torn apart a Vampire other than a Vampire or a Werewolf. Also, Werewolves are pretty much anti-Vampire units."
Originally posted by Robtard
Nope. You "dared" me to make a thread, one of which you think you can win.
I wouldn't do any winning, at all. This thread, Edward clearly wins. In another thread where the books are used? It wouldn't be as hard to find obscure quotes and scenes from the movies because the book wikitards have it easily text searchable.
Originally posted by Robtard
I refused for obvious reasons, I have no knowledge of one side (book Twilight). I don't debate unless I know both sides, cos I am honest and fair and made of awesome. You should strive to be like me.
Well, that's not true. You refused because you know you'd get your ass handed to you even worse, in such a thread. And you do argue in thread you don't know enough on, all the time.
Originally posted by Robtard
Pointing out that I'm following the rules while mocking you was the correct reply. So I win again.Robtard: 9,769 Dadudemon: 0
Pointing out that you admitted, publicly, to hiding behind rules just to win a lame argument...and still failing to actually win said argument, is what is funny. 😄
I say, good day, sir. GOOD DAY!
P.S. You know I love you. IDGAF about this lame as debate nor do I care to entertain one in the AvF. What a WASTE of lame ass time. I should be arguing with Paul while waiting for my wife's guest to leave so we can sexy times.
Originally posted by Robtard
Wolfboys have no problem snapping them apart either and I've yet to see the Wolfboys swing around motorcycles like wiffle ball bats, bend prison bars, knock down steel poles and make indents in concrete with a foot stomp.Tried? More like ripped apart and slaughtered with facts. Good day!
Well that's coz they don't have arms to lift motorcycles. These are not regular wolves. They are specifically designed to kill vampires so they're strength is pretty near a vamps.
Stating how the werewolves can bite through vamps is not a showing of how weak a vamp is but rather a showing of how strong a were is.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Wrong: that feat is in line, very nicely math-wise, with a statement Edward made in Twilight (the first one): Vampires are a thousand or thousands of times stronger than humans (I do not remember which...but 1000 is just enough to make my point about the 200-4000 tonne force feat with the tree).
DDM, do you know what hyperbole is?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Wrong:"Nope, it takes the strength of a Twivamp to break Edward. It was taking all of her (Victoria's) strength to try and pull Edward's head off."
"You didn't read, then. I provided a nice in-mobie rebuttal: you did not provide an reply to that."
"Bella also refers to Edward as "diamond" hard, as well. Also, she refers to Edward as "bullet proof'."
"I think tearing apart a vampire shows far greater strength that Yu-Law ever shows."
"Point me to anything that has torn apart a Vampire other than a Vampire or a Werewolf. Also, Werewolves are pretty much anti-Vampire units."
I wouldn't do any winning, at all. This thread, Edward clearly wins. In another thread where the books are used? It wouldn't be as hard to find obscure quotes and scenes from the movies because the book wikitards have it easily text searchable.
Well, that's not true. You refused because you know you'd get your ass handed to you even worse, in such a thread. And you do argue in thread you don't know enough on, all the time.
Pointing out that you admitted, publicly, to hiding behind rules just to win a lame argument...and still failing to actually win said argument, is what is funny. 😄
I say, good day, sir. GOOD DAY!
P.S. You know I love you. IDGAF about this lame as debate nor do I care to entertain one in the AvF. What a WASTE of lame ass time. I should be arguing with Paul while waiting for my wife's guest to leave so we can sexy times.
Circles in the sand...
He clearly doesn't, why you "dared" me to make a thread elsewhere.
No, what I said: I refused cos I couldn't objectively debate against a book character I've not read. Listen, if you want Book Edward Vs Whatever so much, you go make it.
LoL, "You're following the rules of the forum, you bastard!!!11!" Try harder, dude.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Well that's coz they don't have arms to lift motorcycles. These are not regular wolves. They are specifically designed to kill vampires so they're strength is pretty near a vamps.Stating how the werewolves can bite through vamps is not a showing of how weak a vamp is but rather a showing of how strong a were is.
So you need arms to show strength now? Nope.
Strawman? Cos I never once claimed the twi-vamps are weak. My argument is that Law is strong enough to harm Edward, cos he's shown the strength to.