Was this guy really almost raped or is he a drama king?

Started by Astner3 pages

Originally posted by Bigon
Actually when I was 14 I would not have rejected any advances from Vanessa unless there was something really wrong with her appearance that wasn't mentioned, or she had some horrible disease.

I was always rather selective with the girls whom I slept with. Well, beggars can't be choosers I suppose.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, look at that kid, like he'd not welcome any sort of female attention.

Well considering how he admitted to being asexual, which is taboo, I'm inclined to more or less believe his story. Though I can see why you—in your bitterness—would suspend your belief in his story.

Originally posted by Mindset
I like you.

Then you don't know me.

Originally posted by Astner
Well considering how he admitted to being asexual, which is taboo, I'm inclined to more or less believe his story. Though I can see why you—in your bitterness—would suspend your belief in his story.

He's not asexual, so just stop talking.

Originally posted by Astner
Then you don't know me.
I think he meant "I like you."

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Gunpoint bjs always result in subpar quality.
The terrified look in her eyes as she stares at you makes up for it.

True. Damn blindfolds aren't always fun.

It's only less bad than a group because of the increased trust issues a group would present. That's about it.

I will say though the rationality of these forums isn't the norm as witnessed by the fact that most of the time if a female teacher molests male students everyone thinks he's a lucky bastard but if a male teacher does the same to a female student he should catch a shiv in the joint.

Originally posted by Astner
I was always rather selective with the girls whom I slept with. Well, beggars can't be choosers I suppose.

Well considering how he admitted to being asexual, which is taboo, I'm inclined to more or less believe his story. Though I can see why you—in your bitterness—would suspend your belief in his story.

We would prefer it if you were not abrasive towards us. I do believe the boy in the video was telling the truth. I suggest you re read my post.

"We"? "Us"? Are you royalty or to you have multiple personalities?

I don't recall asexuality ever being taboo in the sense that homosexuality is.

It might draw curiosity, or in individual cases efforts to "fix" the person. But it's not taboo on a societal level because it's so unobtrusive.

homosexuality is not unobtrusive?

Originally posted by Oliver North
homosexuality is not unobtrusive?

Gay Pride Parade:

Asexual Pride Parade:

its the pigs repressing those asexuals though. Look at them, they have that street on lockdown/

Originally posted by Oliver North
homosexuality is not unobtrusive?

Perhaps I phrased that poorly (speaking of which, double negative much? 😛), but yes, I would say that homosexuality comes off as a much more disturbing sexuality than asexuality to a lot of people.

It might just be a matter of there being more homosexuals than asexuals, but I can't think of a single "We hate asexuals" protest or organization. Much in the same way (and no, I don't think this is a particularly strong comparison/analogy--I'm just really lazy tonight) that there are many more anti-Muslim groups than anti-Atheist groups in America today.

Edit: I've only known one asexual before, and he told me that it wasn't that he was never sexually aroused, it was just that he was never aroused by sexual traits of either gender, more aroused by gender-neutral traits like slender waists and wrists

well, sure. But I'd say that is more about ignorant people being obtrusive to homosexuals than the other way around.

There are no holy books condemning asexuality or a history of psychology that called it a mental disorder/perversion/crime.

Originally posted by Oliver North
well, sure. But I'd say that is more about ignorant people being obtrusive to homosexuals than the other way around.

There are no holy books condemning asexuality or a history of psychology that called it a mental disorder/perversion/crime.


No argument there. But the fact is that society (to use a broad, vague term broadly and vaguely) perceives homosexuality as more obtrusive because it cuts against the grain rather than opting not to cut at all or cut in any particular fashion.

I get what you are saying, I guess I didn't like the wording. Made it almost sound like gay people were getting like aggressively into people's faces and making out...

Originally posted by Oliver North
I get what you are saying, I guess I didn't like the wording. Made it almost sound like gay people were getting like aggressively into people's faces and making out...

There are examples of posters on this forum who are so inculcated against homosexuality that the mere existence of a gay person is seen as offensive.

And look at Ukraine, where it's now considered "propaganda" to even identify yourself as gay, as if acknowledging its existence is somehow spreading it.

Did see a couple of gays holding hands while walking down the street in San Francisco a few months back.

Originally posted by Astner

Then you don't know me.

Why would I want to know you?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
"We"? "Us"? Are you royalty or to you have multiple personalities?

It's Smeagol and Gollum.

Originally posted by Oliver North
There are no holy books condemning asexuality or a history of psychology that called it a mental disorder/perversion/crime.

Paul, in the New Testament, even praises asexuality and it is part of why the Catholic church has unmarried clergy.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
And look at Ukraine, where it's now considered "propaganda" to even identify yourself as gay, as if acknowledging its existence is somehow spreading it.

Looks like I'm moving to Ukraine.