Originally posted by NemeBro
Timeline has everything to do with it, you're just not intelligent enough to grasp the reasoning behind it.
Which media came first has everything to do with it. I challenge you to link me to evidence that what you say is true. A direct quote from Rowling or Lucas, mind you.
Originally posted by RobtardI can roll with this. Now apply the same rule to Skywalker,
No, it does matter. Original media rules when there's two of the same character events and there's a conflict.
There's no conflict concerning Star Wars film Luke and EU Luke.Are you effing kidding me?
If there was Harry Potter film made after the books, anything Potter does in those wouldn't be bound/restricted to the books.
Er........
Not that is matters though, even gimping Luke to Ep4-6 and allowing Harry Potter anything from the films and books, Luke would still likely win by a simply wave choking Potter out as his enhanced Jedi speed/reflexes/precog grant his first attack.
No. Harry would apparate away before Luke even raises his hand. You need to accept this.
Whitey, you seem incapable of grasping that this is EU Luke. He has been given time to learn/develop new technniques and has grown exponentially in power.
Your argument for gimping Luke falls apart at this:
The HP movies take place at the same time of the books, and are based exactly off them. However, there are discrepancies. In those cases, the books will take precedence.
The Star Wars books, however, take place 1-50 something years after ROTJ. Therefore, this Luke is not the same Luke as in the movies, unlike Potter. He is an entirely different animal.
Originally posted by Pwned
Whitey, you seem incapable of grasping that this is EU Luke. He has been given time to learn/develop new technniques and has grown exponentially in power.Your argument for gimping Luke falls apart at this:
The HP movies take place at the same time of the books, and are based exactly off them. However, there are discrepancies. In those cases, the books will take precedence.The Star Wars books, however, take place 1-50 something years after ROTJ. Therefore, this Luke is not the same Luke as in the movies, unlike Potter. He is an entirely different animal.
No, I realize this is EU Luke. Read the argument and try to keep up. Sorry it's not a pop-up book.
Nah, the timeline argument is a crutch. It doesn't matter, because all media goes.
Originally posted by Casper Whitey
I can roll with this. Now apply the same rule to Skywalker,Are you effing kidding me?
Er........
No. Harry would apparate away before Luke even raises his hand. You need to accept this.
Done.
Can you point out where Ep 4-6 Luke directly contradicts something EU Luke can do?
Did you not follow the like comparison?
Nope. Luke is faster, Jedi abilities grant him this. Potter is as fast as a typical man-boy his age.
Originally posted by Robtard
Done.Can you point out where Ep 4-6 Luke directly contradicts something EU Luke can do?
Did you not follow the like comparison?
Nope. Luke is faster, Jedi abilities grant him this. Potter is as fast as a typical man-boy his age.
Done and, done.
Lol, again with the time line BS. Let it go, you're trolling.
I did. Get off the timeline BS.
Apparition>>>>>>Fast Jedi. Fact. Accept it.
Whitey, you are confused. The movies only trump the EU in issues of canonicity. Which basically means that if a conflict arises over how an event occured then the movies take precedence. It does not however, mean that the movies are the only aspect of Star Wars that we can ever look to about anything. That would be dumb.
As for the fight, Luke pwns Potter a millisecond into the fight, using the Force to pin him to the floor like he did to Jacen Solo, without moving a muscle or appearing to exert himself at all.
Originally posted by NephthysSo you think that Luke can pin Harry to the ground before Harry can apparate? You think that the force can keep prevent teleporting?
Whitey, you are confused. The movies only trump the EU in issues of canonicity. Which basically means that if a conflict arises over how an event occured then the movies take precedence. It does not however, mean that the movies are the only aspect of Star Wars that we can ever look to about anything. That would be dumb.As for the fight, Luke pwns Potter a millisecond into the fight, using the Force to pin him to the floor like he did to Jacen Solo, without moving a muscle or appearing to exert himself at all.
Originally posted by NephthysAh, knew you would say this. Wrong. See, Harry is not moving by physical means, he is apparating, a magical means of teleporting. There is nothing, I repeat nothing, in the entire Star Wars films/books that suggest that the Force is capable of restraining someone who can teleport via magic.
You need to move (specifically, turn) to apparate. Luke will stop Harry from moving. Hence Harry cannot apparate.QED.
Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Ah, knew you would say this. Wrong. See, Harry is not moving by physical means
... except when he is? We have this explained at quite some length to us in the books where the Apparation classes explicitly say that to apparate you need to turn on the spot.
Furthermore, can you tell me of a single time Potter has used apparation in combat?
Originally posted by Nephthys
... except when he is? We have this explained at quite some length to us in the books where the Apparation classes explicitly say that to apparate you need to turn on the spot.Furthermore, can you tell me of a single time Potter has used apparation in combat?
Yeah but Harry didn't "turn on the spot" when he apparated in the movies. Oh wait, let me guess, books counter that?
Back at you, when has Luke used the Force to restrain a teleporter? BTW, Harry used teleporting in the Deathly Hallows during combat.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Yes.In the latest series of books against Abeloth? She can teleport (As well as melt a city by getting pissed off, just to let you know how out of his league Potter is). Let me guess, in the movies right?
No. All feats count here.
Ah, but it she a wizard? Does she use Harry Potter magic? Nope. She is a Dark Side force user.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Except when they contradict each other you blibbering tool.Who cares? You didn't say they needed to use magic. Point is, Potter can't teleport if he's eating dirt with Luke's invisible boot on his back.
Lol, again with the personal insults. Calm down, man, it's just a stupid vs debate.
You are comparing two totally different forms of teleporting, that's all I am saying.