Originally posted by Oliver North
Beyond the distinction between maybe ICBM/plane/Sub-launched and dirty/truck/small-warhead, do you guys really think the distinctions between the possible weapons, such as thermonuclear or "pure fusion", are going to change the global reaction in a serious way?I get there may be differences in fallout/etc, but the geopolitics should be identical, at least in any immediate/short term.
No, I don't make such a presumption.
Agreed. It doesn't matter what type of WMD is being used here, as the reaction will more or less remain the same. Mere lip service in all likelihood.