HOTH Hulk and Thanos vs H/P Doomsday and Darkseid

Originally posted by SquallX
You do know that the OE failing had nothing to do with Darkseid not being able to erase Doomsday, more had to do with plot demanding Superman going against him and finding out how Doomsday was created.

Originally posted by h1a8
I thought you onced said that was the OB not the OE that DD tanked? Stop flip flopping. The OE=/=OB remember.

Also DD>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanos

Team 1

Team 2.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You're making an excuse which has nothing to do with the fact DD survived the omega beams. It happened so deal with it. The writer has used these terms interchangeably. Fans want to create a difference among the semantics of it. I won't allow you. I don't flip flop but appare\ntly you have done a lot of this recently.

Get off you're ****ing high horse.

You know what? Using you're idiotic logic, anyone with a Hell-carrier hanging around can beat the Void, all they have to do s drop it on him.

They can use the hellicarrier to stop Void if they've already roughed him with a couple of heralds and metas and street levelers amped to heightened power levels with Norn Stones first, yeah.

As far as this thread goes, team 1 due to no BFR.

T1.

Originally posted by SquallX
Get off you're ****ing high horse.

You know what? Using you're idiotic logic, anyone with a Hell-carrier hanging around can beat the Void, all they have to do s drop it on him.

team 1.

edit

Quan, stop baiting people.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You're making an excuse which has nothing to do with the fact DD survived the omega beams. It happened so deal with it. The writer has used these terms interchangeably. Fans want to create a difference among the semantics of it. I won't allow you. I don't flip flop but appare\ntly you have done a lot of this recently.

You are the one claiming that the blast DD tanked was the OE when in fact in the past you argued it wasn't the OE but rather the OB.

Selective memory?

Team 1

Originally posted by h1a8
You want allow me? lmao

You are the one claiming that the blast DD tanked was the OE when in fact in the past you argued it wasn't the OE but rather the OB.

Selective memory?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I argued writers use the words interchangeably. Darkseid wanted to destroy DD. He didn't.

Yet in the past you keep arguing that it wasn't the OE but rather the OB which is different. So stop lying. You are flip flopping and I caught you. You change your argument when it is more convenient I see.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yet in the past you keep arguing that it wasn't the OE but rather the OB which is different. So stop lying. You are flip flopping and I caught you. You change your argument when it is more convenient I see.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's called changing an opinion. The intent of Darkseid was clear. He wanted to destroy Doomsday but the beams failed. The writer clearly used Darkseid as a stepping stool in order to show Doomsday was beyond even darkseid.

Ok good! You finally see what we were talking about a long time ago. Nothing wrong with changing an opinion. I have done this many times on KMC.

Team 2 also imo.

Does the writer say he used the OE?

Originally posted by -Pr-
Does the writer say he used the OE?

I don't think so. So IDK. It could be

1. Writer's interpretation of Darkseid's power (Writer's believes OB=OE but used the term OB as it sounded better).

or

2. DS purposely used the OB instead of the OE (which makes no sense because DS wanted to end DD and was shocked DD survived.)

TBH, I don't care one way or the other as we seen what the blast did at less than half power on panel to those indestructible missiles, which Superman with all his might couldn't put a scratch on.

So I use that feat to show the power those beams were operating at in that same comic.

Is Hoth Hulk, like, really cold?