They're the same guy really with only one significant difference. Dark Avengers Sentry "knew" he was a matter manipulator (apparently he wasn't really) and could use it (he mostly didnt) whereas The Sentry in WWH could only use this ability subconsciously (it was probably the source of all his other powers). If The Void attacked WWH Sentry in this way he might get a temp victory or two in the same way the Molecule Man did but for whatever reason its not something he seemed to like to do.
In terms of strength, durability etc theres no reason to believe that the Sentry in Siege was any more powerful though it tends to be a common belief in many forums. The Sentry's durability did tend to go into the toilet as Dark Avengers progressed to the point where he was getting decapitated by Caps shield in Siege and he became more of a regenerator rather than the Superman-like hard durability character from earlier. But i guess thats a bit of a wash.
Originally posted by FifthchildIs there much of a point when dealing with lying gambits like you.
In the face of such relentless logic what can one do but concede?Well argued champ.
You use Cap shield slicing open Void as a marker for his durability yet ignore the fact Cap was amped by the Norn stones. Prior to that hit Void took hits from Thor amped by stones and he took multiple lightning amped strikes earlier.