Can The noted Sates Of America Win. A Nuclear War?

Started by Colossus-Big C1 pages

Can The noted Sates Of America Win. A Nuclear War?

1. Very Few Countries Are Military Capable Of Getting A Nuke To USA, while we can nuke anywhere in the world in a few minutes.

2. The ones that can have unreliable delivery systems, and we can shoot them down way before the missles get here.

3. No ship or submerine with a nuke would get anywhere close to usa (our navy and coast guard would kill them)

4. No Plane Or Jet with Nukes would get anywhere near USA, no country besides us has stealth B2 Bombers, plus our Navy and Airforce would destroy any jet coming here.

5. We know the location of all ICBMs, we will destroy all of them quick.

6. We have the largest number of nukes.

7. USA> Everything .

Russia has a nuclear arsenal and the means to deliver it that could wipe out the USA completely. Of course we could easily do the same to them. The old cold war term of Mutually Assured Destruction still applies here.

Dem Noted States.

Edit: Haven't you already done 3 or 4 of these threads?

^Word. No one will "win" a nuclear war; all shall be lost.

Re: Can The noted Sates Of America Win. A Nuclear War?

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
1. Very Few Countries Are Military Capable Of Getting A Nuke To USA, while we can nuke anywhere in the world in a few minutes.

2. The ones that can have unreliable delivery systems, and we can shoot them down way before the missles get here.

3. No ship or submerine with a nuke would get anywhere close to usa (our navy and coast guard would kill them)

4. No Plane Or Jet with Nukes would get anywhere near USA, no country besides us has stealth B2 Bombers, plus our Navy and Airforce would destroy any jet coming here.

5. We know the location of all ICBMs, we will destroy all of them quick.

6. We have the largest number of nukes.

7. USA> Everything .

Well, I would certainly hope this is what spending more money on defense than the next 14 largest military spending countries combined would give you...

What is your fetish with nukes?

Originally posted by Archaeopteryx
Russia has a nuclear arsenal and the means to deliver it that could wipe out the USA completely. Of course we could easily do the same to them. The old cold war term of Mutually Assured Destruction still applies here.
but read the op, how are they nukes going to get here?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
What is your fetish with nukes?
Nuclear war is Inventible

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Nuclear war is Inventible

Not really. Possible? Yes. But not inevitable, especially not the world-ending kind where two superpowers let fly.

There aren't many scenarios in modern warfare where nuclear weapons are useful, and governments realize that there's no going back once you use them.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not really. Possible? Yes. But not inevitable, especially not the world-ending kind where two superpowers let fly.

There aren't many scenarios in modern warfare where nuclear weapons are useful, and governments realize that there's no going back once you use them.

Yes, but whats stopping a terrorist from detonating one? You know that its policy that if The DOD sees a Nuke being launched toward USA they will automatically fire back tacticle Nukes at them before it even gets to USA.

this means enough nukes to make that country unable to fire anymore back.

So yes all it takes is one nuke for a country to be slaughtered by nukes.

Also The USA has Accidentally Nuked itself by accident on 3 occasions. Other countries have also.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Yes, but whats stopping a terrorist from detonating one? You know that its policy that if The DOD sees a Nuke being launched toward USA they will automatically fire back tacticle Nukes at them before it even gets to USA.

this means enough nukes to make that country unable to fire anymore back.

So yes all it takes is one nuke for a country to be slaughtered by nukes.


The fact that terrorists don't have nukes? And even if they did, terrorists detonating a nuke doesn't qualify as nuclear war.

Are you talking about terrorists or other countries? You're not being clear.

Talking about other countries

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Talking about other countries

Then why bring up terrorists?

How long before the science behind a nuke is common knowledge ? And people are able to make Homemade nukes?

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
How long before the science behind a nuke is common knowledge ? And people are able to make Homemade nukes?

I'm pretty sure the principles of nuclear weapons are already "common" knowledge, but even so building a nuke is so costly and difficult that I think we'll have flying cars and cities on Mars before you start seeing homemade nukes.

Why, do you think you could build one?

Do you think Einstein can build a nuke?

lol

Closing this thread due to the fact that it's giving me a headache.