What does his invulnerability have to do with his bloodlust or ruthlessness? TBH I think it would make him more dangerous because he can't afford to just tank stuff like he usually does. Do you mean that even without it you don't see him fighitng out of character? Yeah thats it. I think he can still take it.
Invulnerability or not comic Superman stomps. Plus he has enough telepathic resistance showings to make a case of Luke failing to mind control him.
Returns Supes...he still has all possible advantages, but he ain't 1/4 the fighter his comic counterpart is. Telepathy might work or it might not.
The opening post had this stipulation:
Originally posted by jmoulSo yeah the lightsaber will be able to kill him. Thing is with his invulnerability off Superman has to be more careful of how he uses his vast super human strength or he might end up owning himself in the process.
Superman has all his powers except his invulnerability to make this a more fair fight.
Originally posted by the ninjak
Superspeed + Super Stregth + Heat Vision/Freeze breath negates the OP's negation of Superman's durability.jmoul is a extreme rascist idiot.
How in the world do you come up with this? I took invulnerability out of Superman's powers so Luke could have a CHANCE to actually win this.
Also, not sure how you come to the conclusion that I am a racist idiot, but it shows that you are an overly critical piece of shit that reads too deeply into things.
Originally posted by Impediment
ninjak and jmoul STOP!Any more name calling will result in a warning for you two.
Ninjak, there's no need to bait, and jmoul two wrongs don't make a right.
I apologize for my retaliation.
I would just like to say this (and I don't think I am alone in my opinion): I hate it when people make wild accusations about somebody else who they don't know personally without good reason, and I will fight back should I feel insulted in that way.