Bane vs. Bryan Mills

How will Bryan's particular set of skills do against Bane?

Setting 1: Sewer where Bane and Batman fought

Setting 2:

Bane gets shot.

I forgot, no guns obviously.

Bryan takes off Bane's mask, and shoots him with it somehow. Either that or he punches him in the neck.

Bane gets stabbed

Bryan Mills get TAKEN to school.

peaches

Bryan is a much better fighter than Batman. And he's not stupid. As strong as Bane is, he's not invulnerable against joint locks and bone breaks.

Bane is faster and stronger.

Bryan fought fodder in the both movies with exception to maybe 1 or 2 people. Bryan gets his old geriatric face punched off.

Bryan's standard equipment also included weapons.

Originally posted by marwash22
Bane is faster and stronger.

Bryan fought fodder in the both movies with exception to maybe 1 or 2 people. Bryan gets his old geriatric face punched off.

And Batman didn't fight anything but Fodder aside from Ra's and Bane?

He beat one by dumb luck, and the other by plot stupidity.

cool.

but...

Originally posted by marwash22
Bane is faster and stronger.

Bane is stronger. I doubt faster.

lol, u serious? did you watch Taken 2? They edited the crap outta that movie with extremely fast cuts due to Liam Neeson being old as hell. They knew he couldn't move fast enough to be believable as someone who could take out several men at once.

So his feats from Taken 1 don't count?

And even though they edited, Bryan Mills has those feats. I guess they "edited" Dark Knight Rises since Tom Hardy and Christian Bale can't punch and kick through concrete pillars.

Originally posted by -Pr-
So his feats from Taken 1 don't count?

Originally posted by KingD19
I guess they "edited" Dark Knight Rises since Tom Hardy and Christian Bale can't punch and kick through concrete pillars.

Originally posted by marwash22
we're supposed to ignore Taken 2?

Not saying that.

Editing isn't really something you can use in an argument, is it? I mean, IN the movie, he is that fast. That's the writing, the directing and everything else portraying him as. They might do it badly, but I'm not sure that's enough.

my point is that the character LOOKED slower than he did in the first movie.

But it doesn't matter because Bane is faster than Bryan from the first movie.

Based on what? Batman wasn't all that fast in any of the movies when it came to fights.

Nolan-verse is painfully realistic.

based on the way he moved.