Difference is he acted like an ungrateful shit when the game did good and he realized it, instead of swallowing his pride and asking for more because he had no idea how good things would go. CDPR are awesome and somw of the nicest devs currently on the market. Witcher 3 has helped fund Poland itself by their hand. If he had acted right he could've gotten something but he basically attacked them.
Despite what he says, the games have given him something, albeit indrectly. The games have introduced the books to an entire new audience who otherwise probably never would have heard of them or bought them. I, myself, own five of his books that I never would have bought had I not loved The Witcher 3 so much.
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1057640842201055232
He looks like he decided to dress up as a half-assed Geralt for Halloween, lol. He really doesn't suit the role but we'll see I guess.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
https://www.engadget.com/2018/10/03/witcher-author-demands-16m-royalties-cd-projekt-red/Gotta say that's mighty scummy. Basically "your game's gonna be crap, I don't want your shares. Nobody's gonna want Witcher. Oh, it did well? Uh, hey, can I have some money? I'll sue if you don't gimme." I get this douche canoe created Witcher but he sold the rights. This shouldn't even be a debate.
The author of the Metro novels called Andrzej Sapkowski An “Old Fool” among other things
https://www.pcinvasion.com/metro-2033-witcher-author-sapkowski/
Anyone still wondering about that dispute between CD Projekt and the Witcher author, it's been settled.
https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/12/20/cd-projekt-red-strikes-new-deal-with-witcher-author