Originally posted by Darth Martin
Honestly, what was wrong with the first one? Sure, Olyphant could have been meaner and not had so much dialogue but I really can't see them making a film much better than the one they already did.
It sucked. The pacing was horrible, the action was horrible, and Olyphant was not believable at all in the role. I couldn't get into the fiction of him being some trained from birth assassin the way he played it. To be honest, that's truly the director's fault because he's done fine in other films, and it was his stilted, dry acting that killed this which is no doubt what the director asked for.
I'd rather watch the first G.I. Joe again than have to watch Hitman.