https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/928695155724398592
Tomorrow morning.
http://mashable.com/2017/11/07/justice-league-embargo-critics-reviews-rotten-tomatoes/#2e_pNb7exiqA
But the most telling stat here might be the lack of a first-wave of social-media reactions. Big studios, including Warners, have lately been showing their blockbusters to smaller groups of curated movies writers and critics, giving them a separate, earlier window to tweet reactions.
Case in point: DC's own Wonder Woman, which allowed social-media posts a whopping 13 days, 21 hours ahead of the critics' embargo. They were over the moon – and kicked off a wave of positivity that carried Wonder Woman to a 92% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Predicted result: 33% on Rotten Tomatoes for Justice League
Without a social-media lift, and with that stingy embargo-to-release turnaround time, it looks like Justice League may hew closer to its direct antecedent, the critically razed Batman v Superman, which ultimately came in at 27% (rotten). (BvS was given a lead-time of two days, 4 hours – a little more generous than Justice League, but still in that rotten zone.)
Originally posted by playa1258I imagine this will be better than Batman v. Superman (movie was pure shit) but not close to WW level in quality. I'd hope it has far better action than WW and a better villain. That mandate to make it two hours or less is so retarded to me.
I think it will be in the 60's at best.
Originally posted by playa1258
https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/928695155724398592Tomorrow morning.
Hope so. Shall I bring out the popcorn? 😛