Originally posted by quanchi112
Zan doesn't back down for dragons. You champion cowardice.
right, see: thats the problem.
only a suicidal raging time-bomb would have a policy of "don't back down to dragons".
their whole hunting strategy was based on being chased and using themselves for bait. you keep scripting that his rage-quit was some kind of dragon-slaying technique-gone-wrong. its getting boring.
it was suicide.
he had a ladder to climb down.
your assertion that the dragon would have DEFINATELY crashed through the building is just plain stupid, and you're stupid for spending 120 pages repeating that same horseshit.
now get mad and say something stupid.
Originally posted by focus4chumpsNo, it Wasnt. He did what he felt correct in the situation he was in according to his personality.
right, see: thats the problem.only a suicidal raging time-bomb would have a policy of "don't back down to dragons".
their whole hunting strategy was based on being chased and using themselves for bait. you keep scripting that his rage-quit was some kind of dragon-slaying technique-gone-wrong. its getting boring.
it was suicide.
he had a ladder to climb down.
your assertion that the dragon would have DEFINATELY crashed through the building is just plain stupid, and you're stupid for spending 120 pages repeating that same horseshit.
now get mad and say something stupid.
Get a clue.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
That 2nd one was a thread? And I missed it?!Well F**k...
you didnt miss it. its right here. minus all the "herp derp mcclane" distraction tactics to avoid the point of what a lame pony he chose to back (and lestov until he accepted reason 3 months and 100 pages later).
he tries it a lot here as well, every now and then.
Originally posted by focus4chumps
you didnt miss it. its right here. minus all the "herp derp mcclane" distraction tactics to avoid the point of what a lame pony he chose to back (and lestov until he accepted reason 3 months and 100 pages later).he tries it a lot here as well, every now and then.
How does one BACK Van Zan against McClane and remain intellectually functional?
Oh that's right.... We are talking Quan Logic here....
Originally posted by focus4chumpsSo upset. Good. Zan wins again.
you didnt miss it. its right here. minus all the "herp derp mcclane" distraction tactics to avoid the point of what a lame pony he chose to back (and lestov until he accepted reason 3 months and 100 pages later).he tries it a lot here as well, every now and then.