Denton Van Zan Vs. the Wood-chipper from Fargo

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect. I directly quoted Quinn about the "three months" and you said that was Quinn's comment was speculation and not proof that the dragons were actually gone, ergo, your stance of Van Zan saving the world and therefore being a badass is speculation in kind. Though really, Quinn did all the saving in RoF.

We all saw you self pwn; this is a fact.

YAY PAGE 33!!!! now nobody will know what a ridiculous hypocrite you've been.

Originally posted by quanchi112
His comment that this indeed would happen is speculation. he did say it but he's a human being. You acting like the man can predict the future and is always right is just trolling. You can't comprehend much.

The future? What the hell are you talking about, his "three months" comment was referring to three months in the past. You need to watch the film again. This is beyond ridiculous now, how you get everything about RoF wrong.

You self pwned and utterly killed the one thing you were clinging to "Van Zan saved the world", it's just "speculation" by your skewed point of view.

he gets it.

he's just pretending he doesnt.

Originally posted by Robtard
The future? What the hell are you talking about, his "three months" comment was referring to three months in the past. You need to watch the film again. This is beyond ridiculous now, how you get everything about RoF wrong.

You self pwned and utterly killed the one thing you were clinging to "Van Zan saved the world", it's just "speculation" by your skewed point of view.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
YAY PAGE 33!!!! now nobody will know what a ridiculous hypocrite you've been.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying your speculation that the dragons would starve out before the humans died off is speculation. It is. What isn't is the fact humanity was saved. Praise zan.

Switching back to that, how funny. The film tells us that the dragons were starving and were gone by around "three months". Now dance again and say Quinn was "speculating" and that there's no way to know he was right which in turn you self-butt**** your "Van Zan saved the world" stance, cos that too would be just "speculation" in turn.

he understands perfectly how he pwned himself

Originally posted by Robtard
Switching back to that, how funny. The film tells us that the dragons were starving and were gone by around "three months". Now dance again and say Quinn was "speculating" and that there's no way to know he was right which in turn you self-butt**** your "Van Zan saved the world" stance, cos that too would be just "speculation" in turn.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
he understands perfectly how he pwned himself

Originally posted by quanchi112
The dragons were not ever starved out completely by the end of the film. Fact. Quinn through Zan ended the thread for all time.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I hope rob does finally understand.

Originally posted by focus4chumps

All logical non-sequiturs of yours aside; "if proof"? lol

You can't even spell a sentence containing the phrase "right as rain", let alone actually BE it.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
All logical non-sequiturs of yours aside; "if proof"? lol

You can't even spell a sentence containing the phrase "right as rain", let alone actually BE it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The dragons were not ever starved out completely by the end of the film. Fact.

Quinn through Zan ended the thread for all time.

Proof? Cos Quinn was pretty confident they were all dead and gone by the three months. The movie > what you need at a given point in a debate.

That would be "speculation" as well by your very own arguments. By your logic, was that the only male? Van Zan and Alex just "figured" they were like fish and speculated that there was only one male, it was just speculation. It's great when you destroy your own arguments.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I post more than you so an error or so is allowed. You obsessing over every letter of my posts is proof enough I am burrowed deep inside your head.

Thats not my head: Its your own arse you have ensconced yourself in. That will likely just add to the further butthurt you suffer from day in day out.

All you post is error.
You could at least attempt to not rage-misspell to hide your obsessive rage and butthurt.... Guess you can't help yourself though, eh..? You're nothing but a worthless spam generator, as you agree by the 'logic' of your above fallacious statement.

Originally posted by Robtard
Proof? Cos Quinn was pretty confident they were all dead and gone by the three months. The movie > what you need at a given point in a debate.

That would be "speculation" as well by your very own arguments. By your logic, was that the only male? Van Zan and Alex just "figured" they were like fish and speculated that there was only one male, it was just speculation. It's great when you destroy your own arguments.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Thats not my head: Its your own arse you have ensconced yourself in. That will likely just add to the further butthurt you suffer from day in day out.

All you post is error.
You could at least attempt to not rage-misspell to hide your obsessive rage and butthurt.... Guess you can't help yourself though, eh..? You're nothing but a worthless spam generator, as you agree by the 'logic' of your above fallacious statement.

Get a room.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
Get a room.