Re: Wolverine vs Superman in a durability feats
Originally posted by golem370wolverines damage soak is overall inferior, because he can be disabled with far less.
Now this is a thread trying to figure out if Wolverine with his adamantium bones plus his healing factor is as durable, more durable, or less durable then Superman based of durability feats.
Originally posted by 753
thats true. though if he walked out he still had enough muscle to move, which is a pretty high durabilty feat all things considered
His arm moved despite it being pretty much "skeletonized". That wasn't the weirdest part about it, though. No claws were visible... they were sheathed, so they should be attached somehow to his forearms' bones... but there was nothing.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTWtsc those silly comic book people
His arm moved despite it being pretty much "skeletonized". That wasn't the weirdest part about it, though. No claws were visible... they were sheathed, so they should be attached somehow to his forearms' bones... but there was nothing.