BAMF vs Animals.

I wanna see how tough people think humans are.
So this will be a man of Brock Lesnars Stature with Anderson Silvas fighting skill (any other words 250lbs of muscle & one of the best fighters on earth)
How would this man do against the following opponents:
(Fights them 1 at a time, fully healed in between each round)
1: Siberian Tiger
2: Polar Bear
3: Kodiak Grizzly Bear
4: Silver Back Gorilla
5: Wolf

The fight will take place an an arena (coliseum type battles)
Both the human and animals are going for the kill
No weapons. No armor

Every animal except the wolf wins 10/10 times. haermm

He clears it.

Man's been killing these *****-ass animals with his bare hands since the dawn of time.

No, we've been doing it in packs with sharp objects. Our frame is terrible for any kind of one to one physical confrontation with a rival predator if we lack a weapon.

We're endurance animals who could chase down herbivores as a group, or use spears or clubs effectively. Compare us in physical power to a gorilla and we're pathetic. Compare us to a Siberian Tiger (Bengal Tigers can kill elephants if they're hungry enough.) and we're an easily attained snack.

1: Siberian Tiger - Takes it out via knees to the face
2: Polar Bear - Rear naked choke
3: Kodiak Grizzly Bear - Armbar
4: Silver Back Gorilla - fist and elbows to the face; then once downed classic mount and ground-n-pound
5: Wolf - Kimura

Brock Lesnar is a large man but he couldnt even beat The Rock on his own. He needed help from Heyman and even a chair.

Anderson Silva is a great fighter in his own right but he isnt as large as Brock Lesnar and that alows for quicker movements.

Putting Silvas fighting style with Lesnars size would actually hinder his ability to fight as well as Silvas normally.

A Siberian Tiger can weigh up to 700 pounds and can run up to 60mph. With natural ferocity, weapons, and hunting ability it is incredibly hard to see any unarmed man take one down with his bare hands. Not to mention it is considered the Strongest land animal on earth.

A Polar Bear can weigh up to 1500 pounds and reach speeds of 25 mph. Though slower then the Tiger they are still incredibly strong and can kill an animal of 1200 pounds with a single hit. This is another animal I dont see any human fighting unarmed and winning.

A Grizzley Bear is closley related to a Polar Bear but the Polar Bear is actually considered stronger. The Fact of the Polar Bear able to kill an animal of around 1200 pounds with a single hit came from the Grizzly. Another Animal that can not be beaten by an unarmed man.

Silver Back Gorillas weigh up to 400 pounds and have the highest Mix of Strength and Dexterity over any animal. They have been known to be able to bend tempered steel bars and snap thick stalks of bamboo with little effort. A man has a better chance to beat the Tiger then he does beating a Silverback Gorilla.

The Wolf is the only animal in the list that a human might have a chance against in an unarmed fight. A Wolf is a pack hunter and uses Distraction tactis in order to take down its prey. A single wolf may be easily taken down by someone who is quick and strong.

Siberian Tiger Vs Man? No
Polar Bear Vs Man? No
Grizzly Bear Vs Man? No
Gorilla Vs Man? No
Wolf Vs Man? Maybe.

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
Brock Lesnar is a large man but he couldnt even beat The Rock on his own. He needed help from Heyman and even a chair.

Wrestling is fake so everything else you claimed is based on a faulty premise and can therefore be ignored.

BAMF takes it 10/10 for each animal, it's been shown.

The animal facts are Facts. Show me evidence a human who was unarmed and alone in an enclosed space beat any of these animals in its prime.

Saying they are not in their prime is gimping the animals in favor of the Man.

Show me evidence of any of those animals who alone in an enclosed space beat a BAMF in his prime (though by definition a BAMF is always in his prime).

Originally posted by Robtard
Show me evidence of any of those animals who alone in an enclosed space beat a BAMF in his prime (though by definition a BAMF is always in his prime).

Pretty sure animal handlers aren't on the average 6'3" 250+lbs and come with the highest rated MMA skills.

At least not the ones at the San Francisco City Zoo.

Oh yeah. Cause punching a Grizzly Bear is gona make it run away. Even if you put your hands up to block a swip from a Grizzly you are gona get your arm broken and gouged. either way your not using that arm to defend the next swipe.

Now I hate to say this.. I REALLY do.. but even McClane, with no weapon and no where to hide or run to would lose this. And I am a big McClane fan.

OH****, McClane has entered the thread. ABANDON SHIP.

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
Oh yeah. Cause punching a Grizzly Bear is gona make it run away. Even if you put your hands up to block a swip from a Grizzly you are gona get your arm broken and gouged. either way your not using that arm to defend the next swipe.

Now I hate to say this.. I REALLY do.. but even McClane, with no weapon and no where to hide or run to would lose this. And I am a big McClane fan.

I said the Grisly goes down via an armbar. You're not even reading what I'm saying, man.

Take that back.

Yeah I know what an Armbar is and if you think that will take down a Grizzly you are LOL in the head. If you think a man can Armbar a creature of 1000lbs+ at 7ft tall.... Not to mention its natural Fangs and Claws... the man will get shredded, dropped, and ate for supper.

A man? Certainly not. We're talking about a BAMF though.

👆

No man, BAMF or otherwise, could take down any of these animals with his barehands and on his own. With the Exception of the wolf. McClane could be considered a BAMF and he would still lose. Probably even to the wolf! Arnold Swertzenager(dont care) in his prime couldnt beat a Grizzly Bear and he was considered a BAMF back in his day.

And even IF, IIFFF, he beat the Grizzly bear with a submissive move... -.-' ... How would he beat the Siberian Tiger? Certainly not a Knee to the face. you couldnt knock out one of these monsters with a ****ing baseball bat!

Simple maths.

Grisly bear > tiger (siberian or otherwise)

So that that you've agreed a BAMF > a grisly bear. You must accept that a BAMF > a tiger

I never agreed to anything. A Grissly Bear is not better or worse then a Siberian Tiger since they have both been killing each other for years. It just depends which one has a better reason to win. If one is protecting its cubs then that one will win.

Dont be such a sore loser. Accept the win over the wolf and just lay down and take the rest like a good Jail Bait.