What happened to the no limits fallacy? There are a number of characters that have defeated Ultra-Man, and they did not or were not able to categorically sit in the infinite tier range. That feat should be rendered inadmissible due to inconsistencies. If he does it on the norm, then I'll accept it, but...
Originally posted by Stoic
What happened to the no limits fallacy? There are a number of characters that have defeated Ultra-Man, and they did not or were not able to categorically sit in the infinite tier range. That feat should be rendered inadmissible due to inconsistencies. If he does it on the norm, then I'll accept it, but...
Originally posted by Galan007
When else has Ultraman had the opportunity to lift infinity?
^ He didn't word it that way, nor did he seem to direct that statement toward both parties. He basically said that unless Ultraman lifts infinity on a regular basis, he's not going to accept the feat... Well sorry, but it's not every day that a character gets a chance to lift something with infinity weight, thus we'll likely never see him preform a feat of the same scale again.
Bottom line: Ultraman lifting the book of Limbo by himself, while ridiculous, is still a canon feat-- as is Hyperion holding back 2 universes. That's all I'm saying.
Originally posted by ThereIsHope
I think that universes are defined as infinite. Though they are ever expanding. Which is odd. Go ask a doctor of physics.
So if I'm understanding this correctly, the universe is indeed finite correct? If so I am justified in picking Ultraman's infinite lifting feat apart, and saying that it goes against the no limits fallacy ruling.
In my first post I should have just stated that we should go off of his other feats to come to a sensible conclusion as to which one of these guys are greater. Personally I don't care for either character.