Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
These types of things pretty much always admit a few bad things. Its the declassification of documents that really matters down the line. Obviously you'll discard whatever the inquiry says but then people you trust/like/agree with will get their hands on the documents and have stuff to say.
I believe in the UK at least many people will keep harassing B-liar no matter the level of whitewash.
Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/Or will be see Bliar and Bush at the den Haag?
More Rubbish and troublesome posts from you...as usual
Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
Ha, then post a topic of your own or don't reply. Contribute more than personal abuse young one.
Contribute like your last retarded post getting locked and you being called a troll, been here 9 years buddy.
Or did you not see this?
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=576771&pagenumber=4#post14224567
Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Supra
Contribute like your last retarded post getting locked and you being called a troll, been here 9 years buddy.Or did you not see this?
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=576771&pagenumber=4#post14224567
I am glad you have been on the same forum 9 years. I am sure you are a highly respected member and extremely articulate and well educated with a depth of understanding of world issues, science and DBZ. Troll mwah, never. I think perhaps the kindly moderator had recieved a complaint from someone who does not understand ironic posting or satire.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
I am glad you have been on the same forum 9 years. I am sure you are a highly respected member and extremely articulate and well educated with a depth of understanding of world issues, science and DBZ. Troll mwah, never. I think perhaps the kindly moderator had recieved a complaint from someone who does not understand ironic posting or satire.
Did u read? The moderator said troll thread closed..How hard is that to understand. Been here 1 day and your already labeled a troll by the moderators.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Supra
Did u read? The moderator said troll thread closed..How hard is that to understand. Been here 1 day and your already labeled a troll by the moderators.
Almost certainly because someone who does not understand art had complained to him and it was simpler than explaining the joke. The problem with simple people is they mean it’s impossible now to employ any degree of comic ambiguity for fear of them choosing to misrepresent it. I was using an exaggerated form of the rhetoric and the implied values of misogyny to satirise the rhetoric and the implied values of misogyny - And it is a shame to have to break character and explain that. But hopefully it will save you a long, tedious exchange of messages.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
Almost certainly because someone who does not understand art had complained to him and it was simpler than explaining the joke. The problem with simple people is they mean it’s impossible now to employ any degree of comic ambiguity for fear of them choosing to misrepresent it. I was using an exaggerated form of the rhetoric and the implied values of misogyny to satirise the rhetoric and the implied values of misogyny - And it is a shame to have to break character and explain that. But hopefully it will save you a long, tedious exchange of messages.
Ok so you, the post whore seld labeled "ExtemeAss" with naked pictures of dudes in your profile posted that as a joke and what did you expect the forum to do..ROFL? Cause you meant it as a joke?
Break character..what character, are you a actor of words?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Supra
Ok so you, the post whore seld labeled "ExtemeAss" with naked pictures of dudes in your profile posted that as a joke and what did you expect the forum to do..ROFL? Cause you meant it as a joke?Break character..what character, are you a actor of words?
We are all actors and the world is our stage... It is unfortunate you didn't understand my last post at all; it really was very good.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
We are all actors and the world is our stage... It is unfortunate you didn't understand my last post at all; it really was very good.
I understand it fine, however pumping up your grammer skills to try to overtalk and using the word rhetoric 3 times stopped me from caring about what you wrote. You obviously care more about your typing skills then you do anything else.
I was tired of your rhetoric.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Supra
I understand it fine, however pumping up your grammer skills to try to overtalk and using the word rhetoric 3 times stopped me from caring about what you wrote. You obviously care more about your typing skills then you do anything else.I was tired of your rhetoric.
I was trying to explain satire which is ironic.
Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/Or will be see Bliar and Bush at the den Haag?
Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
Den Haag means the Hague in its own country. Bliar is a joke, Tony B liar. You don't read much do you? Ironically you started a sentence with capital 'And'.
"Or will be see Bliar and Bush at the den Haag?"
Starting a sentence with 'and' is not a grammatical error, it might be a no-no among anal retentive elementary school English teachers, but it's not a true error. Oh, and before you point out that what I quoted was a spelling error and not a grammatical error, I should point out that I didn't say you committed a grammatical error, but rather implied that your own carelessness leaves you little room to judge the construction and content of others' posts.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Lol. That's what you think I was talking about?"Or will [b]b
e see Bliar and Bush at the den Haag?"Starting a sentence with 'and' is not a grammatical error, it might be a no-no among anal retentive elementary school English teachers, but it's not a true error. [/B]
It's an error, as is capitalising it, ahh, you mean the typo because b and v are next to each other. Good call 👆 *shakes head*
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Anthony Stark
It's an error, as is capitalising it, ahh, you mean the typo because b and v are next to each other. Good call 👆 *shakes head*
Wait, you mean you meant to type "or will ve see"?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Guaranteed whitewash?
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not really. Not unless you go by 5th grade essay standards where you can't begin a sentence with 'because', 'and', and 'but'. And we're not going by those standards because we're adults who know what someone means when he begins a sentence with a conjunction. We are adults, aren't we?Wait, you mean you meant to type "or will ve see"?
Actually no I didn't mean to type that, I meant to type we. I may or may not be an adult on the internet it is almost impossible to tell; however, I do think what we are seeing is how lazy American 'English' is... and if you saw what I did there twice I'll believe you're an adult. I am just an internet meme.