axel_jovan
Looking around.
Simple 🙂
We have seen Vader taking a helluva lot of punsihment in TFU games and still being combat-ready afterwards.
In TFU Vader took to the face an explosion that destroyed emperor’s tower on Death Star. And he was back on his feet moments later.
IN TFU2 on Kamino Marek subdues Vader with storm-empowered lightning and he only manages to make as much damage as to immobilize Vader.
This is the same Marek whose FL casually obliterates AT-AT, and he only managed to zap Vader because he disarmed him earlier of his lightsaber. Seeing how Vitiate sucks at saber-combat, this won't be happening.
Quoting Silver 2467 from here: http://www.comicvine.com/forums/battles/7/darth-vader/748906/?page=2
“And on the subject of TK, I find that doubtful. Vader was collapsing cathedrals only months after RotS; he never achieved the height of his powers until decades later. I have never seen Vitiate replicate Vader's telekinetic precision, range, or versatility either.”
“Except that this requires Vitiate to attack first, which would never happen since Vader's combat speed transcends the former's, and requires that Vitiate can even tag Vader with it, which would never happen since Vader can repel it on his lightsaber.”
“Generic destructive telekinetic feats (like destroying his palace or ripping apart T3) are not what I am referring to when I direct you to Vader's feats of precision, technique, or variety. By that, I mean the times Vader has used Crush on a Jedi with multiple hearts, used Lightsaber Throw to spin his lightsaber around himself, redirected missiles, fired blaster rifles while fighting enemies, levitated himself, etc. Beyond that, the "quality" you attribute to Vitiate, destroying buildings, Vader has replicated anyway.”
^ All of these feats were performed by regular!Vader, now imagine DromundKass!Vader.
In short, yes, I rank Vader above Vitiate.