Originally posted by the Darkone
AD destroys the team period, the hammers will have no affect on the Armor what so ever. AD disintegration beams kills gods outright, it killed Thor outright and neither Kurrth or Nul are greater than Thor in durability they about the same.
Uhm huh what? Did you just say that Thor was as Durable as the Juggernaut? Don't be silly.
Originally posted by h1a8stop making shit up, Juggs force field wasn't skin thick and no he just doesn't get classic Juggs feats you need to prove stuff
Also force fields can be skin thick. So it is possible for Kuurth to have had a force field. The intentions were clearly that he was unstoppable. He definitely gets his classic feats
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I don't think anyone, including you, can read your posts well.No, Juggernaut's field is not always on. As a matter of fact, for the last three decades, it has progressively had less appearances.
Why would Juggernaut without his force field be considered to be as durable as he is with his force field? In what way does that make sense? Juggernaut without his force field has been hurt by far less, his invulnerability has been attributed to his force field since the earliest days and on multiple occasions. He has no non-force field durability feats that even remotely approaching tanking a God Blast. Weakened as it is.
That's fallacious. If Kuurth has not shown the capability to endure the type of damage the Destroyer can dish out, then he clearly loses. Seeing as how the Destroyer is able to cut through something like Mjolnir.
I like how suddenly you are all about suspension of disbelief. I should quote this post to you in future threads because you're making a whole bunch of leaps without any evidence.
Also, Destroyer absorbs the power of every deity in creation and one-shot kills Kuurth so hard, Cytorrak dies. Under the FULL CAPACITY rule of course.
👆
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I don't think anyone, including you, can read your posts well.No, Juggernaut's field is not always on. As a matter of fact, for the last three decades, it has progressively had less appearances.
Why would Juggernaut without his force field be considered to be as durable as he is with his force field? In what way does that make sense? Juggernaut without his force field has been hurt by far less, his invulnerability has been attributed to his force field since the earliest days and on multiple occasions. He has no non-force field durability feats that even remotely approaching tanking a God Blast. Weakened as it is.
That's fallacious. If Kuurth has not shown the capability to endure the type of damage the Destroyer can dish out, then he clearly loses. Seeing as how the Destroyer is able to cut through something like Mjolnir.
I like how suddenly you are all about suspension of disbelief. I should quote this post to you in future threads because you're making a whole bunch of leaps without any evidence.
Also, Destroyer absorbs the power of every deity in creation and one-shot kills Kuurth so hard, Cytorrak dies. Under the FULL CAPACITY rule of course.
There are two types of Juggs. One who is shown with a force field and one whose force field isn't shown. The one who is shown with it, always has it on. The one whose forcefield is not shown, doesn't mean he doesn't have one. It could either be skin deep or non existent. If it is non existent then the writers ties Juggs durability only to his skin. I remember in a comic, in one scene Juggs forcefield was explicitly shown, but in another scene of the same comic, it wasn't.
Using Full Capacity we choose the Juggs with the force field.
Destroyer doesn't have the ability to absorb the power of any deity on its own.
Also, no outside help is allowed.