Batman vs. Link

Started by quanchi11243 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Try actually reading and responding to my post, Quan. It'll be interesting. Sound out the words.
Batman is stronger than Bulbins men. Anyone who reads Batman would laugh at you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Batman is stronger than Bulbins men. Anyone who reads Batman would laugh at you.
Prove. It.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove. It.
Ridiculous.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ridiculous.

Concession accepted.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Concession accepted.
I didn't concede.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't concede.
Yes, you did. Rather than support your argument when called on it you simply posted a one word response and refused to provide any evidence.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You clearly don't read Batman comics. Lol.
Dodge + Red Herring?

This is about Link, soooo.... do tell how being more aware and skilled would take away his increasing durability feats.

You say it doesn't after all.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Yes, you did. Rather than support your argument when called on it you simply posted a one word response and refused to provide any evidence.
You clearly don't read Batman. Batman wins.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Dodge + Red Herring?

This is about Link, soooo.... do tell how being more aware and skilled would take away his increasing durability feats.

You say it doesn't after all.

Bulbins henchmen is canon. Batman wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You clearly don't read Batman. Batman wins.
Prove your claim. You claim Batman wins but have not provided any evidence to support as much.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove your claim. You claim Batman wins but have not provided any evidence to support as much.
You are ignorant. Batman wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are ignorant. Batman wins.

Concession accepted. You didn't even try.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Concession accepted. You didn't even try.
You never made an argument.

My argument: Link is awesome. My evidence: Link has awesome feats which have been displayed.

Your argument: Link is not awesome. Your evidence: You have none.

Prove Batman is capable of winning or Batman is not capable of winning. L2Debate.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
My argument: Link is awesome. My evidence: Link has awesome feats which have been displayed.

Your argument: Link is not awesome. Your evidence: You have none.

Prove Batman is capable of winning or Batman is not capable of winning. L2Debate.

Kod by Bulbins men. Batman is greatly skilled at hand to hand combat and has greater strength feats.

Already done.

Bulbins men easily kod him.

Prove he's stronger than a Bulbin. Also Link's durability increased beyond that point anyway.

Prove your argument.

Not current Link, but it's irrelevant since you have not proven Batman is even as strong as a Bulbin.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove he's stronger than a Bulbin. Also Link's durability increased beyond that point anyway.

Prove your argument.

Not current Link, but it's irrelevant since you have not proven Batman is even as strong as a Bulbin.

Read comics. Bulbins men crushed Link. Canon.

Prove your claim. Link became more durable later.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove your claim. Link became more durable later.
Prove he became more durable. Bulbins men crushed him. Awful.

Axe to the chin from King Bulbin. Done.

Then you refuse to support Batman and concede. Good.