Voldemort, Basilisk vs. Gandalf the White, Balrog

Originally posted by quanchi112
There was no spells to tke down the magical barrier. Pure force damaged it and pure force took it down. Why the hell would he waste his time when he could easily disarm it with a spell ? He lost a Horcrux and lashed out destroying it with pure force alone. Your arguments are shit and are void of anything even close to resembling evidence.

There are specific spells which perform certain functions you have no proof this is one of them. None. Zero. Zilch.

As to the Balrogs durability we see a lightning blast destroy him after he was weathered by Gandalf who really demonstrated nothing really powerful IMO other than the lightning strike.

Fair enough. Prove it was a "do anything" spell. You're making the claims, prove it.

You have no proof that spell Voldermort used is a "do anything" spell. Considering HP is made of spells for given affects, it stands to reason you're wrong.

Please keep ignoring that it survived a multi-mile fall (aka a durability feat)while insisting that the shield's durability is what matters in your comparison. It's all you have, clown tactics.

Also, 😂 at you angling this into yet another Balrog Vs Voldermort thread, cos you clearly lost the last time. You're terrible at this; possibly the worst.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fair enough. Prove it was a "do anything" spell. You're making the claims, prove it.

You have no proof that spell Voldermort used is a "do anything" spell. Considering HP is made of spells for given affects, it stands to reason you're wrong.

Please keep ignoring that it survived a multi-mile fall while insisting that the shield's durability is what matters in your comparison. It's all you have, clown tactics.

Also, 😂 at you angling this into yet another Balrog Vs Voldermort thread, cos you clearly lost the last time.

The Balrog and Gandalf both survived but we've seen far less durability wise beat Gandalf the Grey.

I for one think the Basilisk clearly kills the Balrog I am just entertaining your points. Voldemort can blast him with energy while his flies around and laughs at him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It was pure force attack. I don't have to prove it as this is obviously the case but if you feel otherwise the burden is on you. You claimed a specific spell so you need to do so. How can you have debated here for years without a sense of debating etiquette ?

The Balrog and Gandalf both survived but we've seen far less durability wise beat Gandalf the Grey.

I for one think the Basilisk clearly kills the Balrog I am just entertaining your points. Voldemort can blast him with energy while his flies around and laughs at him.

Ah, the fallback: "I don't have to prove my claims!" Quanchi method when you know you have nothing.

The: "I'm going to go with lowest showing for LoTR and highest showings for HP". That's always a treat.

Except of course you've angled this into yet another Voldermort Vs The Balrog thread, cos you're still upset over getting your ass handed to you in the original.

You've essentially made a dupe thread, again. 😂 Hopefully no one else will entertain your butthurt.

Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, the fallback: "I don't have to prove my claims!" Quanchi method when you know you have nothing.

The: "I'm going to go with lowest showing for LoTR and highest showings for HP". That's always a treat.

Except of course you've angled this into yet another Voldermort Vs The Balrog thread, cos you're still upset over getting your ass handed to you in the original.

You've essentially made a dupe thread, again. 😂 Hopefully no one else will entertain your butthurt.

I am going by a Gandalf the Grey win and loss. I didn't film the scenes so control yourself.

I won that thread. Who wins this thread iyo ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You made the claim that it was a destroying shield spell. You made the claim. If they were all shield destroying spells where's your proof ? It makes no sense.

I am going by a Gandalf the Grey win and loss. I didn't film the scenes so control yourself.

I won that thread. Who wins this thread iyo ?

Despite the fact that it was a spell that destroyed a magical shield? 😂 But go on pretending it's a "do anything I want" spell. Takes down magical shields, destroys Balrogs, makes sandwiches, whateva.

You're going by 'best showings for the side I love and worst for the side I hate' clown tactics, as per your MO.

Oh my, the crying starts. You lost that thread; it's why you've angled this thread to be a repeat. Hoping people will be sick of the same debate and you can do your "concession accepted" bit and be the last to post. It's just what you do.

Originally posted by Robtard
Despite the fact that it was a spell that destroyed a magical shield? 😂

You're going by clown tactics, as per your MO.

Oh my, the crying starts. You lost that thread; it's why you've angled this thread to be a repeat. Hoping people will be sick of the same debate and you can do your "concession accepted" bit and be the last to post. It's just what you do.

Typical robotic response from you which addresses nothing.

You still won't even answer the thread topic due to being upset the Potterverse is winning these threads.

Would you two just **** already? Jeez, I'll pay for the lube if Rob's feeling gentle, but ffs. haermm At least post image macroes if you're coing to mock each other incessantly.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It was a blast not a shield.

Typical robotic response from you which addresses nothing.

You still won't even answer the thread topic due to being upset the Potterverse is winning these threads.

I love it when you add nothing knew and a copy/paste works to continually crush you:

Despite the fact that it was a spell that destroyed a magical shield? 😂 But go on pretending it's a "do anything I want" spell. Takes down magical shields, destroys Balrogs, makes sandwiches, whateva.

You're going by 'best showings for the side I love and worst for the side I hate' clown tactics, as per your MO.

Oh my, the crying starts. You lost that thread; it's why you've angled this thread to be a repeat. Hoping people will be sick of the same debate and you can do your "concession accepted" bit and be the last to post. It's just what you do.

Originally posted by Robtard
I love it when you add nothing knew and a copy/paste works to continually crush you:

Despite the fact that it was a spell that destroyed a magical shield? 😂 But go on pretending it's a "do anything I want" spell. Takes down magical shields, destroys Balrogs, makes sandwiches, whateva.

You're going by 'best showings for the side I love and worst for the side I hate' clown tactics, as per your MO.

Oh my, the crying starts. You lost that thread; it's why you've angled this thread to be a repeat. Hoping people will be sick of the same debate and you can do your "concession accepted" bit and be the last to post. It's just what you do.

So who wins iyo ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's an energy blast which has force behind it. We see far less force defeat the Balrog. I've already told you this but you seem unable to decipher sentences now at this point.

So who wins iyo ?

You can't have your "do anything I want" spell, no matter how hard you cry.

Give me a single good reason why I should say who wins here when you've angled this thread to be yet another 'Balrog Vs Voldermort' thread and it was shown the Balrog won in that thread? <--- I suspect you'll dodge this question

Originally posted by Robtard
You can't have your "do anything I want" spell, no matter how hard you cry.

Give me a single good reason why I should say who wins here when you've angled this thread to be yet another 'Balrog Vs Voldermort' thread and it was shown the Balrog won in that thread? <--- I suspect you'll dodge this question

This thread has two other characters yet you obsess over two. You're butthurt not I.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it was that you was brain mistaking my argument. Voldemort's destructive energy blast was destroying parts of the wall in OOTP. It wasn't a spell designed to destroy walls. That's how awful your logic is.

This thread has two other characters yet you obsess over two. You're butthurt not I.

"It destroyed part of a wall, it can destroy the Balrog!1!!" 😂

Yup, you dodged my question just as I assumed you would. Oh well.

PS have fun swallowing your own a**h**e in here 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
"It destroyed part of a wall, it can destroy the Balrog!1!!" 😂

Yup, you dodged my question just as I assumed you would. Oh well.

PS have fun swallowing your own a**h**e in here 🙂

Run like you always do.

Originally posted by quanchi112
See this is another example of your brain unable to see the true point. Your Initial claim was this spell specifically destroys shields. I said the energy is sheer destructive force and cite another battle thereby proving it. You'll talk random trash and actually believe you're debating.

Run like you always do.

😂 You just fisted your own ass again. Your argument now is that it's the same spell, used to bring down the barrier and destroy a bit of wall, then logic tells us the magical barrier obviously wasn't some uber durable barrier as you argued it was, it just keeps people out as it kills on contact. Ergo, that "blast" spell doesn't do much to the Balrog, who survived a several mile fall.

Cry and dance now, like you always do after destroying your own argument. 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 You just fisted your own ass again. Your argument now is that it's the same spell, used to bring down the barrier and destroy a bit of wall, then logic tells us the magical barrier obviously wasn't some uber durable barrier as you argued it was, it just keeps people out as it kills on contact. Ergo, that "blast" spell doesn't do much to the Balrog, who survived a several mile fall.

Cry and dance now, like you always do after destroying your own argument. 🙂

Balrog doesn't disintegrate his foes I mean hell Gandalf looked worse off after his loss to Saruman the White.

Voldemort easily wins over the Balrog but Gandalf the White is here as is the Basilisk.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's destructive energy. Just some residual energy escaping the bulk of it meeting Dumbledore's head on was enough to destroy parts of the wall. The reinforced shield withstood hundreds of blasts if not thousands but was brought down immediately by Voldemort's destructive blast.

Balrog doesn't disintegrate his foes I mean hell Gandalf looked worse off after his loss to Saruman the White.

Voldemort easily wins over the Balrog but Gandalf the White is here as is the Basilisk.

In other words you have no real proof just how durable the magical barrier was and are pulling claims out of your ass again. "Blast spell broke part of a wall!" 😂

And that proves what here exactly? Is it now a battle of "who can disintegrate better"? More clown tactics.

Yup, called it "Voldermort beats the The Balrog!!!!!1!". Good game.

Originally posted by Robtard
In other words you have no real proof just how durable the magical barrier was and are pulling claims out of your ass again.

And that proves what here exactly? Is it now a battle of "who can disintegrate better"? More clown tactics.

Yup, called it "Voldermort beats the The Balrog!!!!!1!". Good game.

The shield disintegrates those who touch it I mean who did the Balrog even kill. His power was less than Sarumans.

If we pair them up against each other then absolutely but the thread doesn't end there.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Durable enough to withstand hundreds/thousands of blasts from wizards over many minutes. It's like you forget what I told you 10 minutes ago like a goldfish.

The shield disintegrates those who touch it I mean who did the Balrog even kill. His power was less than Sarumans.

If we pair them up against each other then absolutely but the thread doesn't end there.

And how powerful where each of those wizard bolts? 🙂 (we've done this before; you cried and made shit up)

As typical you're just making shit up. "The shield disintegrates people; that makes it durable!" Having a killing effect on people does not equal to durability, you dum-dum.

You did. The thread ends when people get tired of entertaining your nonsense and you'll have the last post with something like "concession accepted" or "you ran because you're scared" type of post.

Originally posted by Robtard
And how powerful where each of those wizard bolts? 🙂 (we've done this before; you cried and made shit up)

As typical you're just making shit up. "The shield disintegrates people; that makes it durable!" Having a killing effect on people does not equal to durability, you dum-dum.

You did. The thread ends when people get tired of entertaining your nonsense and you'll have the last post with something like "concession accepted" or "you ran because you're scared" type of post.

Withstanding hundreds possible thousands of blasts over many minutes makes it durable while disintegrating makes it more powerful than the Balrog.

I make clear points while you frequently misunderstand others while dodging questions.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Powerful enough to ko a human or knock them back 15 feet or both. That's one example. That's more powerful than a Saruman push which defeated Gandalf in their pansy wizard battle.

Withstanding hundreds possible thousands of blasts over many minutes makes it durable while disintegrating makes it more powerful than the Balrog.

I make clear points while you frequently misunderstand others while dodging questions.

😂 so each wizard bolt is less powerful than a bullet and are non lethal. 😂 😂 😂 Sad thing, we've done this before and you still didn't learn.

Withstanding hundreds (possibly thousands if we wank) of bolts that are non lethal and less powerful than a bullet isn't superior to the durability required to survive a multl-mile plummet.

Now the crying and "I'm better than you!" rants, so soon, it's only page 2. You really screwed your own argument with that "destroyed part of a wall!!!11" bit. What were you thinking?