Team Mk/Harry Potter vs. Team LOZ/Lotr

Started by quanchi11220 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Aonuma said the manga is part of HH. HH is canon. 1+1.
Is it in Hh but is it canon ? Prove it, sub.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
In other non canon manga they give a say so. As that doesn't exist in HH as well as not being seperated from the book in any written word or quote, then it must be as canon as HH. The quote has posted somewhere on one of these forums abd you know you've seen it. If you don't have a counter argument, thenno ffurther proof is needed.
You need a quote saying its a part of continuity. Burden is on you.

Why?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Why?
Your claim.

We provided evidence. And though it isn't definitive, it's more than anything you've brought. Unless you provide a counter argument, we have all the proof we need.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
We provided evidence. And though it isn't definitive, it's more than anything you've brought. Unless you provide a counter argument, we have all the proof we need.
You didn't provide adequate proof. Burden is on you so it's a concession.

Even if my proof is only half adequate, .5> 0.
If you don't provide any evidence to the contrary, then we must accept the evidence we have as fact.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Even if my proof is only half adequate, .5> 0.
If you don't provide any evidence to the contrary, then we must accept the evidence we have as fact.
You didn't provide adequate ala burden is still on you.

A. It was bundled wiyh HH, the official canon book.
B. It included with HH in a quote by aonuma.
C. It lacks any sort of identifier/disclaimer that other non canon material have.

Feel free to rebute any of the above points.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
A. It was bundled wiyh HH, the official canon book.
B. It included with HH in a quote by aonuma.
C. It lacks any sort of identifier/disclaimer that other non canon material have.

Feel free to rebute any of the above points.

It is a part of Hh. That doesn't make it canon unless you have a quote saying as much.

We have a quote saying HH is canon. If you don't have one that seperates the two, then we must assume it is equally canon.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
We have a quote saying HH is canon. If you don't have one that seperates the two, then we must assume it is equally canon.
No, we have a quote saying its in Hh which is true.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, we have a quote saying its in Hh which is true.

So you deny HH is canon?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you deny HH is canon?
Manga isn't canon.

Then you deny that HH is canon.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Then you deny that HH is canon.
No, just the manga.

The manga is HH.

Before we start playing verbal ping pong again, is there any quote/writing/disclaimer out there that seperates HH and the manga?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Before we start playing verbal ping pong again, is there any quote/writing/disclaimer out there that seperates HH and the manga?
I enjoy that description of how this goes. haermm

Quan's aversion to logic, evidence, or canon, and tendency to repeat disproven points ad nauseum does kind of force a game of verbal pong where both parties repeat themselves over and over until he gets tired and packs it in.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The manga is HH.
Prove it.