Originally posted by TheGodKiller*sighs*
The term "multiverse/multiversal" is missing in those scans. There is no allusion whatsoever that the Monitor is a multiversal being in those scans. Everything you have stated in response to my query has been "theorycrafting" by definition.We'll see soon enough then.
Then you have nothing to lose, just like me. In fact, I have everything to gain, if theorycrafting can be substituted for actual proof on the VS forum.
This isn't 'theorycrafting', bud. This is fact. Either your comprehension skills are sub-par(unlikely), or your hate is blinding you.
Monitor talks about the multiverse being destroyed.
Monitor states he is linked with/empowered by ALL positive matter.
Monitor states that his power decreases with each universe destroyed by AM.
...Yet he's not multiversal, iyo? C'mon, dood. srsly
Originally posted by TheGodKillerWill do. 👆
Logging out now. Galan, please pm me the responses of Bada and Pr.
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Being what you are, you would indeed fail at my ""craft", which is debating intelligently.I never knew this is how felt about my shoe licking your arse.
My arse being licked by a shoe? I'm going to guess that's an insult in troll language. Not sure I have a comeback for that, you win.
Didnt the Chaos King eat like 97% of the multiverse? And is he only accepted as a multiversal being because the word multiverse was specifically used?
COIE AM destroyed, or converted near infinte amount of universes ( only a couple remained) to anti matter but he isn't multiversal because that word wasn't specifically used to describe his actions?
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
There is zero mention of the term "multiverse/multiversal" in that scan, yet somehow, someway that equates to the Monitor being a multiversal being.Theorycrafting so fine, that it becomes "incontrovertible/indisputable/unarguable" fact. Props for that. You're a gifted comic book theorist. 👆