*nods to Quan* Which is the better franchise: Bond or Bourne

Started by The_Tempest2 pages
Originally posted by Lestov16
Nikita is also good, with far better writing (some of the best on TV IMO), but weaker action sequences than Alias.

(!)

Far better writing? Ehh....................................

I can't watch Nikita since

Spoiler:
Percy and Roan
bit it.

Bond

Originally posted by the ninjak

They should make a Splinter Cell movie.

They are.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Bond films were so corny and stupid IMO. Daniel Craig first one was ok though.

Skyfall would probably cater more to your test than the classic Bond films which were more campy. Bourne should be more up your alley too.

Personally I deplore everything that is realistic, gritty, edgy, serious or dark, give me campy over that all day everyday.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
(!)

Far better writing? Ehh....................................

I can't watch Nikita since

Spoiler:
Percy and Roan
bit it.

That was a great season finale. Don't worry. They do a good job with the replacements.

Originally posted by Bentley
Skyfall would probably cater more to your test than the classic Bond films which were more campy. Bourne should be more up your alley too.

Personally I deplore everything that is realistic, gritty, edgy, serious or dark, give me campy over that all day everyday.


I like the style of grittiness, but with the over-the-top action of camp. That's why I like the Bourne films so much.