This woman should be President

Started by Newjak2 pages

Originally posted by Oliver North
so, is the video really just a rant against the mother? I only watched a couple mins
Pretty much.

It goes

Clip of mother saying something

Judge ranting about how it's against America

Originally posted by Oliver North
so, is the video really just a rant against the mother? I only watched a couple mins

Yeah, in the typical Fox on a high horse attitude no less.

so, this woman should be president because she yelled at a women who can't defend herself?

'Murica!

Originally posted by Archaeopteryx
Why, Because it's the truth?

Oh, it's one of you guys... the "You can't handle the truth!" people. I've seen many of you around this site, you come, you go, your arguments are always shallow, one-statement, usually lines from a movie, oops-i-didn't-really-think-about-that-the-whole-way-through.

Believe me, if one of us can't handle the truth, it's you.

This would woman should most definitely not be President of the United States.

Based on how Arch is debating, however, this is trollery.

The Boston bombings are inexcuseable and nothing can justify them; however, the motives behind the bombings are sadly understandable. The Tamerlan brothers certainly went about things the wrong way, of course...

Oh I see. People don't like my arguments and now I'm a troll. Osama bin Laden was shot and killed without any "due process", was that a "travesty of justice"? Do people here emphathize with him?

I would say yes, it would have been far superior if America could have taken Bin Laden alive...

what is your point?

Originally posted by Oliver North
I would say yes, it would have been far superior if America could have taken Bin Laden alive...

what is your point?

The point is, even MSNBC was cheering when that happened. Everyone was. If the jihadists view themselves at war with us then maybe we should accomodate that

man, if only Americans could ever see the world beyond their own magnificently limited perspective...

and by Americans, I mean, almost exclusively, Archaeopteryx

Religion, all religion, not just islam, is the most intolerant mindset on the planet. So when some commits, or attempts to commit, mass murder in the name of religion then we should be tolerant of that and emhathize why they did it? I don't think it's my view of the world that's distorted.

Originally posted by Archaeopteryx
Oh I see. People don't like my arguments and now I'm a troll. Osama bin Laden was shot and killed without any "due process", was that a "travesty of justice"? Do people here emphathize with him?

Very poorly constructed red herring. 👇

Edit: For what it's worth, I don't think you're a troll. A troll purposely riles other people up, and often succeeds at it in spectacular fashion. All that you've managed to accomplish so far in this thread is antagonize your own self.

Trolling is an art. You're certainly no artist./shrugs

He stopped talking about Global Warming, so I guess he needs another warpath.

Originally posted by Archaeopteryx
Oh I see. People don't like my arguments and now I'm a troll. Osama bin Laden was shot and killed without any "due process", was that a "travesty of justice"? Do people here emphathize with him?

I'm having trouble even connecting this to what we were previously discussing.

I would have preferred that Bin Laden been taken alive. Additionally, Bin Laden's motives were NOT the same as the Tamerlan brothers. Do your homework.

Originally posted by Archaeopteryx
The point is, even MSNBC was cheering when that happened. Everyone was. If the jihadists view themselves at war with us then maybe we should accomodate that

That's right. As Alonzo said, to protect the sheep you have to catch the wolf, and it it takes a wolf to catch wolf. Screw being the better man in the situation and trying to uphold moral decency. Eye for an eye Hammurabi-style, bytches! That's how we do! Amurica, phuck yea!

I don't think she should be president. I think where she is now is the perfect place for her. She's a bit angry and full of piss and vinegar. Her type of personality would certainly attract some of the GOP, a few of the libertarians (but the extreme majority would shun her shitting all over rights like she did), and possibly a few nuts. But she would fail spectacularly with her attitude and vitriol. I do not know of a president that has been elected, yet, from purely negative campaigning.

We'd need some of her platform and talking points before we could consider her candidacy and make proper judgement.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No, he's [Obama] not [doing a great job]. He's doing well on a lot of things but he's royally ****ing up others.

👆

Originally posted by Oliver North
so, this woman should be president because she yelled at a women who can't defend herself?

'Murica!

A much more accurate and far less strawmanny statement would be, "A 'Judge' makes some political rants about some points the mother, of the Boston Terrorists, brought up in interviews."

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Oh, it's one of you guys... the "You can't handle the truth!" people. I've seen many of you around this site, you come, you go, your arguments are always shallow, one-statement, usually lines from a movie, oops-i-didn't-really-think-about-that-the-whole-way-through.

Believe me, if one of us can't handle the truth, it's you.

No, he's been around for years. He's not going away any time soon. I also agree with many of his political perspectives.

Originally posted by Oliver North
I would say yes, it would have been far superior if America could have taken Bin Laden alive...

👆

Bravo. She must be.

I also don't consider him as the leading person because if he will be then might be we will lose some significant thing.