Battlezone challenge: Khan vs. Darth Vader

Originally posted by Newjak
So??? How does that make those weapons standard equipment for him? He didn't use them before or after that scene so for every scene you see him with those guns there are ten times as many where he didn't have them.

Different mentality doesn't matter. Just because I can hit you really hard before hand and all of a sudden I've become evil doesn't mean I'm going to hit you any less hard.

Now you are starting to seem like a child whose trying to take his ball and go home because no one wants to play by your stupid rules. This maybe a thread you started but you don't get to control all the rules of the BZ. The other person playing does get input.

Yes, it does. Hulk going all out is far more dangerous than holding back.

Yes, they do. 6 movies to one. You want Khan to start out naked while giving Vader 7 movies and say Thats fair. That's because you know Khan wins. 😄

Originally posted by Silent Master
I like how now quan is arguing that using all of Vader's feats is unfair; pretty much tells you that deep down even he knows that Khan loses.

But it's silly to act like somehow all those previous feats from Anakin aren't valid because of a simple name change.

Originally posted by Newjak
You know we could always just start a BZ without him if he wants to play spoiled brat in here.

Originally posted by Newjak
Technically Vader only needs one feat, destroying and crushing all those droids and metal with a thought.

But it's silly to act like somehow all those previous feats from Anakin aren't valid because of a simple name change.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I like how now quan is arguing that using all of Vader's feats is unfair; pretty much tells you that deep down even he knows that Khan loses.

Originally posted by Robtard
Watch ESB. He chokes mother****ers with a thought. Watch RoTS. He crushes multiple droids with a thought.

So you're implying that in a Vs fight, Vader would take many seconds (or minutes, hours?) and ponder if he should use the Force and how exactly he should apply it, maybe ponder what the weather's like on Tatooine too. 😂 You handle losing VERY poorly, man.

You can only use what they on screen and how they do so. You can't just argue by power sets and expect it to be about the characters.

Originally posted by Newjak
Technically Vader only needs one feat, destroying and crushing all those droids and metal with a thought.

But it's silly to act like somehow all those previous feats from Anakin aren't valid because of a simple name change.

That's quan for you, When most people realize that their side loses they admit it, not quan, he starts crying about how unfair things are and tries to change the rules.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Seems like you are trying to give Vader an advantage. He surrendered. Of course he didn't use the gun again. But it is his tech outside using what he had available on Enterprise.

Yes, it does. Hulk going all out is far more dangerous than holding back.

Yes, they do. 6 movies to one. You want Khan to start out naked while giving Vader 7 movies and say Thats fair. That's because you know Khan wins. 😄

Hulk also get's stronger the angrier he gets so bad example. Even if you believe Anakin did get stronger because he wasn't holding back how does that negate his earlier showings? It doesn't logically anything he did while holding back he can do while not holding back.

Like I said you're starting to act like a spoiled child who isn't getting his way. The only feat Anakin needs is the one where he crushes all the droids, boom dead Khan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can start one and challenge whoever you want. Battlezones are a certain debate agreed upon by two posters. You act like you've never done one. Maybe you haven't.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, this is a live action movie debate. That's what I have in mind. Not your battlezone anyways.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It also says Darth Vader so by the battlezone thread only Vader feats apply so I have changed nothing.

So let me get this straight. It's Skywalker from 2 fights in one movie. No other feats of his count in other movies?

Geez you really are eager for Khan to somehow win in some sort of imaginary scenario.

Still that Vader you talk off was at least Kenobi's equal in Sabers and in the Force. So by defeault any prior Saber/Force feats of Kenobi should count for Human Vader.

Also all of AOTC Anakin's feats should count by default, unless you honestly believe AOTC Anakin was possibly superior to ROTS Kenobi and/or Vader.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That's quan for you, When most people realize that their side loses they admit it, not quan, he starts crying about how unfair things are and tries to change the rules.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That's quan for you, When most people realize that their side loses they admit it, not quan, he starts crying about how unfair things are and tries to change the rules.

this 🙂

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
u

So let me get this straight. It's Skywalker from 2 fights in one movie. No other feats of his count in other movies?

Geez you really are eager for Khan to somehow win in some sort of imaginary scenario.

Still that Vader you talk off was at least Kenobi's equal in Sabers and in the Force. So by defeault any prior Saber/Force feats of Kenobi should count for Human Vader.

Also all of AOTC Anakin's feats should count by default, unless you honestly believe AOTC Anakin was possibly superior to ROTS Kenobi and/or Vader.

Agreed ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
6 films vs 1 seems fair to me. Do you disagree ?

It just so happens Anakin has the quantity and quality.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Khan still wins. But my battlezone is mine and person who accepts. Sit on the sidelines.

You know that Vader wins, that's why you're trying so hard to DQ his feats.

Originally posted by Newjak
Anakin still wins even if you give him the guns so I'm not trying to give him any advantage I'm just pointing out how silly it is you have to give them to him.

Hulk also get's stronger the angrier he gets so bad example. Even if you believe Anakin did get stronger because he wasn't holding back how does that negate his earlier showings? It doesn't logically anything he did while holding back he can do while not holding back.

Like I said you're starting to act like a spoiled child who isn't getting his way. The only feat Anakin needs is the one where he crushes all the droids, boom dead Khan.

Any character who goes all out is more dangerous. Thor killed or destroyed Ar Walker when he quit holding back. Quit being disingenuous.

6 films vs. 1. You sound like a baby tbh. 6 to 1 of feats advantage and you're crying.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You know that Vader wins, that's why you're trying so hard to DQ his feats.

Is DQ'ing one characters feats fair?

Originally posted by Newjak
Depending on the the amount feats per film it really isn't an advantage or disadvantage. If Khan was shown being able to withstand standing in a sun and bench press the planet earth in one film it really doesn't matter what anakin did in 6. It's quality of feats not quantity.

It just so happens Anakin has the quantity and quality.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Is DQ'ing one characters feats fair?