Originally posted by juggerman
Whoa you guys are clearly forgetting that Darth Maul had absolutely no trouble whatsoever beating Obi Wan.... years earlier.....when he was still a padawan......Uh what was I talking about? Oh yeah based on this evidence Maul is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anakin cuz Obi Wan could not have improved at all over those years..... and such....
It's not about who Obiwan beat or whether he got good or not, just that Darth Maul effectively fought two jedi's (ok jedi and a padawan) and actually got the advantage over them till Obi wan's lucky shot. Anakin IIRC never took on two jedi's (or a Jedi and a padawan) at the same time. He did defeat Dooku (who was manhandling him and Obiwan) but beating an opponent who can fight two jedi's is not quite the same as fighting two jedi's yourself.
In any case, Anakin might be a better fighter than Maul, but the reason I vote Maul here is because pre-suit Anakin is too reckless and is a complete emotional wreck. He'd probably charge straight on against the other opponents here without knowing a thing about him. If they are stranded on an island then strategy will be just as important in the fight as skill, and Anakin will be blindly just fighting everyone.
Granted, Maul isn't exactly shown as a strategist but at least he's not delusional of his own invincibility. Khan actually has an advantage in the sense that he's supposed to be a great military strategist.