Spock (reboot) vs. Darth Vader (movies only not clone wars flick)

Started by quanchi11224 pages

Originally posted by juggerman
Burden is on you since you claimed "Ak kills him". Prove it does big talker 😂
Ak kills. I proved it works. You need to prove Superman can resist. Can't even resist a Luthor haymaker.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ak kills. I proved it works. You need to prove Superman can resist. Can't even resist a Luthor haymaker.

Prove it does. So far all you've said is "it kills him" with no proof it'll work on aliens. So sad. Would a Luthor hit harm Superman without K-nite being involved? Thought not 😂

When did spock go to hogwarts?

Originally posted by juggerman
Prove it does. So far all you've said is "it kills him" with no proof it'll work on aliens. So sad. Would a Luthor hit harm Superman without K-nite being involved? Thought not 😂
You need to prove it doesn't. Not a durability attack. Superman has kod himself trying to fly.

Ak owns.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
When did spock go to hogwarts?
Hush, kiddo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You need to prove it doesn't. Not a durability attack. Superman has kod himself trying to fly.

Ak owns.

Negative. You made the claim yet cannot prove it. Ak wins was the claim and yet you cannot prove it works against aliens. You've lost

AK failed to own a child, the wizard it rebounded on, and the same child later in life. It's not very good

Originally posted by juggerman
Negative. You made the claim yet cannot prove it. Ak wins was the claim and yet you cannot prove it works against aliens. You've lost

AK failed to own a child, the wizard it rebounded on, and the same child later in life. It's not very good

Your claim it won't work on aliens so your burden. I don't have to disprove your claim you have to prove it.

You not even understand the fundamentals of debating.

Special protection. Superman does not have it. All context you ignore.

Prove it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Your claim it won't work on aliens so your burden. I don't have to disprove your claim you have to prove it.

You not even understand the fundamentals of debating.

Special protection. Superman does not have it. All context you ignore.

Prove it.

You claimed it would work but have nothing to support your claim. It has never worked on a being from another planet and we have no reason to believe it would. Your claim so back it up of you can

It failed time and again. Prove it works on other worldly beings...

Waiting... 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
You claimed it would work but have nothing to support your claim. It has never worked on a being from another planet and we have no reason to believe it would. Your claim so back it up of you can

It failed time and again. Prove it works on other worldly beings...

Waiting... 😂

Ak is proven to work. If you feel it doesn't work on aliens Thats your claim to prove.

Context.

Your claim your burden.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ak is proven to work. If you feel it doesn't work on aliens Thats your claim to prove.

Context.

Your claim your burden.

It was proven to work against aliens? A simple yes or no will suffice. Was it also proven to work against babies, dark wizards and teenage Harry? Again a simple yes or no will do 😂

Context proves you wrong

You claimed it would work. Prove it

Originally posted by juggerman
It was proven to work against aliens? A simple yes or no will suffice. Was it also proven to work against babies, dark wizards and teenage Harry? Again a simple yes or no will do 😂

Context proves you wrong

You claimed it would work. Prove it

It's your claim it won't work so your burden.

No, it doesn't.

It des work but you claimed it won't work on aliens. Prove it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's your claim it won't work so your burden.

No, it doesn't.

It des work but you claimed it won't work on aliens. Prove it.

Negative it's yours and you're either too dumb and/lazy to try to prove it or you know you can't and are just trying to push it on someone else. Poor form.

Si it does

Prove it does as was your claim that it would

Originally posted by juggerman
Negative it's yours and you're either too dumb and/lazy to try to prove it or you know you can't and are just trying to push it on someone else. Poor form.

Si it does

Prove it does as was your claim that it would

Proved it works but your claim is it doesn't work on an alien. It's laughable.
Nope.

Your claim. Your burden.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Proved it works but your claim is it doesn't work on an alien. It's laughable.
Nope.

Your claim. Your burden.

Your claim was it kill Superman, who is an alien correct? So your claim is that it would kill an alien. Prove it

Yup

Negs. On you boo boo

Originally posted by juggerman
Your claim was it kill Superman, who is an alien correct? So your claim is that it would kill an alien. Prove it

Yup

Negs. On you boo boo

Ak works. I don't have to prove it does what it does against anyone. Your claim it does not work so prove it,

You concede if you fail to support your claims.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ak works. I don't have to prove it does what it does against anyone. Your claim it does not work so prove it,

You concede if you fail to support your claims.

So you have no proof? Shall i accept your concession then?

Right back a you. Prove it work on aliens

Originally posted by juggerman
So you have no proof? Shall i accept your concession then?

Right back a you. Prove it work on aliens

You made the claim it wouldn't work. Ak works but if you think it doesn't work on aliens prove it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You made the claim it wouldn't work. Ak works but if you think it doesn't work on aliens prove it.

So you can't prove your claim?

Originally posted by juggerman
So you can't prove your claim?
You made the claim its different due to him being an alien.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You made the claim its different due to him being an alien.

You claimed it would work in spite of him being an alien. Prove it now