Worf vs. Khan

Started by Robtard3 pages

Still believe Khan would win more in a H2H fight due to his superior Augment strength and durability.

But weapons, Worf is taking the lion's share.

BTW, why was this bumped again?

I didn’t know this fight is with weapons. That might tip the scales in Worf favor then, depending on how fast Khan is and his reactions.

Ricardo Montoban ****s Worf right up. Stranhe Khan goes down hard.

Worf definitely can't beat Khan in h2h combat. Worf can take a beating and keep on going, as Rob pointed out, but his physical strength doesn't compare to Khan's. And he's not as quick either.

Even with weapons, Khan is strong enough to kick a dude so hard he flies a good 10-15 feet away. If Khan ever gets a chance to grab his weapon why couldn't he just rip it out of his hands?

I give CumberKhan both wins.

Worf (by feats) is stronger than your average Klingon who are typically x2 human strength for a human of similar size/build.

Khan's still stronger though. He's at least x5 human strength.

Khan stomps Worf.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
Khan dies

Worf is a far better warrior than Khan .. He is also a better tactician .. even if Khan somehow shoots Worf that will not stop him from using a Bat'leth or his fave weapon the mek'leth from killing him

this still I believe

So you're not taking into account how the OP says and and all versions of characters? That means Nu-Trek Khan is included and his feats out him far beyond Worf.

Originally posted by Robtard
BTW, why was this bumped again?

I'll never let you know.