Team Trek vs. Team Wars vs. Team Riddick

Started by quanchi1129 pagesPoll

Who survives ?

Team Trek vs. Team Wars vs. Team Riddick

Each of the these three combatants start out thirty miles away in a 120 mile area. No transportation tech is available. They each have to hunt and kill their opposition. Wilderness type mountain terrain.

The teams are as follows

Trek: Khan (reboot), Spock (reboot), and Nero
Armed with über guns, and phaser for Spock, and Nero's weapons

Vs.

Wars: Obi Wan, Luke Skywalker, and General Grievous
Armed with light sabers

Vs.

Riddick: Riddick, Kyra, and Vaako
(Knives, guns, and more guns)

SW because I am a SW fanboy.

Luke slightly waves his hand and at least two opponents get choked out in a few seconds. Screen feats, ain't they a ***** sometimes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Luke slightly waves his hand and at least two opponents get choked out in a few seconds. Screen feats, ain't they a ***** sometimes.
What makes you think he can choke superior warriors out with the same ease ?

Can they somehow flex their esophagus, making it harder to choke?

Star Wars wins via telekinesis

Can we please just end the thread on this page and not the 60th.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Can they somehow flex their esophagus, making it harder to choke?
They can shoot him. That's for sure.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Star Wars wins via telekinesis

Can we please just end the thread on this page and not the 60th.

Trek wins. Khan hunts them down. Spock and Nero beat them down too if need be.

LOL

The Star Trek team's odds of winning

Originally posted by quanchi112
They can shoot him. That's for sure.

If only luke had some sort of melee weapon he could use to deflect shots... wait a minute.

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL

The Star Trek team's odds of winning

False.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
If only luke had some sort of melee weapon he could use to deflect shots... wait a minute.
Cannot deflect über gun.

Why?

I believe the argument is that the uber-gun was firing ship-destroying blasts, which the lightsaber surely can't block. Thing is, it doesn't matter since the uber-gun can be TK-ripped out of his hand, or the STers can be Force-choked, or some other telekinetic defense.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Why?
You obviously haven't seen the film.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I believe the argument is that the uber-gun was firing ship-destroying blasts, which the lightsaber surely can't block. Thing is, it doesn't matter since the uber-gun can be TK-ripped out of his hand, or the STers can be Force-choked, or some other telekinetic defense.
Did not work that way in the movies. Jedi have to even block shitty droid fire. Khan is the proven Jedi killer.

Which film? The one where lightsabers blocked lasers and cut through blast doors that were supposed to be impenetrable? Yes I did.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Which film? The one where lightsabers blocked lasers and cut through blast doors that were supposed to be impenetrable? Yes I did.
Into Darkness, noob.

He shot at a landed shuttle. The shields were down and he got the jump on the Klingons. What laser has the lightsaber failed to block?

Even so, I doubt a blast that can a destroy a Klingon ship can be blocked by a lightsaber. Not saying I think SW lose here, but Quan's argument about the lightsaber not being able to block the blast does indeed have some merit to it.