Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Feat dismissal? You can't be serious here? You've basically thrown out all of Thor's feats, calling most "hyperbolic" or otherwise declaring, quite arbitrarily how or why they don't count. Conversely, people who are critiquing the Diana feat aren't throwing out the whole thing but rather explaining how or why (in their own opinion) how that feat isn't the be-all/end-all considering it was a shared feat, they were ultimately unsuccessful, and we have no idea what of force Diana was contributing.And again with this "thorbags" shit? It just comes off like you write off anything any one who is arguing in favor of Thor off as garbage and in the same light act like you're the lone bastion of sanity and objectivity here which is...well, not true to be nice. You have two mods who agree Thor is the stronger here, neither of which have an "agenda" or anything so nefarious.
He would overpower Diana, Abhi. Not because I'm a "thorbag" or because I say so, but because feats and evidence suggest it. He wouldn't walk all over her easily, but the gap is noticeable enough for people to see that Thor's the superior physical specimen here.
I've thrown feats out? Which ones?
Don't throw a fit upon being called a thorbag. Its endearing.
uhuh
I haven't seen a single feat which Diana doesn't have a at least a comparable feat. Half a planet? Moving earth. Neutron star? Black holes. Getting choked out by Kurse? Kid amazo and Amazo? What's this feat which has shown Thor as a clear superior?